<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: guenthert</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=guenthert</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 03:42:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=guenthert" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Setting up a Sun Ray server on OpenIndiana Hipster 2025.10"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Theoretically, given a sufficient networking configuration/VPN/etc., you could pull your smart card out of the Sun Ray in your university office, go home, and then drop your smart card into a Sun Ray at home and still have everything back where you left off.<p>They (well, the late models) had a Cisco compatible VPN client built in.  Worked like a charm at my place of work in the late naughts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 09:05:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48047145</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48047145</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48047145</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Diskless Linux boot using ZFS, iSCSI and PXE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, iSCSI is a standard, so chances are better that it's supported in a non-Linux OS, e.g. MS Windows.  Years ago I booted a Windows (7, iirc) client that way, but gave up on it (too much hassle and performance limited by the network) when SSDs became cheap.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:57:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046683</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046683</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046683</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Diskless Linux boot using ZFS, iSCSI and PXE"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"I didn’t want to get into the hassle of repartitioning everything that the boot loader works with both Linux & Windows."<p>Hmmh?  I haven't done so in years, but configuring multi-boot used to be considerably easier than disk-less operation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 07:50:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046627</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046627</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48046627</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Dotcl: Common Lisp Implementation on .NET"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm pretty sure it does.  I would even think that it tries to optimize such, as a recent check-in comment claims improvements of TCO.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 14:49:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986880</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986880</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986880</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Dotcl: Common Lisp Implementation on .NET"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, pity that the early history seems to have been lost.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 14:46:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986854</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986854</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47986854</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Using a 1978 terminal in 2026 (DEC VT-100)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"generating SIGTERM on Control + C"<p>That'll be SIGINT, but I understand, he just tests whether we pay attention.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 08:30:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47972456</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47972456</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47972456</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Your Terminal Is Burning Battery Like It's Mining Bitcoin"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Does session management really belong in the terminal emulator?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 15:59:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47950235</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47950235</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47950235</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "French government agency confirms breach as hacker offers to sell data"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Er? social security covers more than just healthcare and the issue with on-line data in context of healthcare is patients' history, which i) is sensitive and ii) needs to be shared among health care providers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 09:01:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887567</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887567</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887567</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Why Not Venus?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The average lifetime of probes landing on Venus counting in <i>minutes</i> might have something to do with that?<p>"So that’s the bad part. But once you move past it, you start to notice that everything gets easier on Venus."<p>If wishes were fishes ...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 08:46:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887457</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887457</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47887457</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Archive of BYTE magazine, starting with issue #1 in 1975"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed.  How else would we have been able to know that there is a Mind Prober!
Circle 200 on Inquiry card.<p><a href="https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1984-11/page/n173/mode/2up" rel="nofollow">https://archive.org/details/byte-magazine-1984-11/page/n173/...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 09:23:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831968</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831968</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47831968</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Modern Common Lisp with FSet"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, clojure gets away with it thanks to the high performance of the available gc in the JVM. In the Common Lisp world the compiler puts quite some effort into avoiding heap allocation ("consing"); the language was designed with that in mind. Not sure where it's now, but not too long ago SBCL's gc wasn't its strong point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Apr 2026 10:24:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823213</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823213</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47823213</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Want to Write a Compiler? Just Read These Two Papers (2008)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You'll want part 2 as well for a total of 107 pages.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780682</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780682</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780682</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Show HN: Oberon System 3 runs natively on Raspberry Pi 3 (with ready SD card)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> However, C on LLVM or GCC should probably be considered the “upper bound” when it comes to how well a program can be optimized, and thus the benchmark for any performance measurement.<p>Is it? Isn't it rather the case that C is too low level to express intent and (hence) offer room to optimize?  I would expect that a language in which, e.g. matrix multiplication can be natively expressed, could be compiled to more efficient code for such.<p>I would rather expect, that for compilers which <i>don't</i> optimize well, C is the easiest to produce fairly efficient code for (well, perhaps BCPL would be even easier, but nobody wants to use that these days).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 09:29:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749695</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749695</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47749695</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Simplest Hash Functions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <a href="https://github.com/sahib/rmlint" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/sahib/rmlint</a> is the one I had in mind.<p>Ah, right, thanks.  I now dimly recall some old project realizing fs-snapshots using hard links, which one could consider some sort of deduplication as well.<p>> I think you are thinking of block level online deduplicators that are integrated into the file system?<p>Indeed, I was.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 10:39:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738159</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738159</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47738159</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "Simplest Hash Functions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Now I'm no expert in that matter, but the fs deduplicators I've seen were block, not file, based.  Those can clearly not use the file length as they are blissfully unaware of files (or any structure for that matter).  Those use a rather expensive hash function (you <i>really</i> want to avoid hash collisions), but (at least some ten years ago) memory, not processing speed, was the limiting factor.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 09:54:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737816</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737816</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47737816</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "France Launches Government Linux Desktop Plan as Windows Exit Begins"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Linux still doesn't have anywhere near as nice and cohesive as Group Policy, Active Directory etc.<p>I take your word for it (I know of Kerberos and LDAP and Netscape and Sun trying to make such palatable, but clearly haven't followed that in the last quarter-century).<p>That assumes however the server to be currently MS Windows.  For government agencies, I'd rather expect some Mainframe to be (and remain) in place.  Surely IBM (or here rather Groupe Bull) has user authentication/authorization figured out (more than half a century ago, methinks).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:15:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718507</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718507</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718507</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "France to ditch Windows for Linux to reduce reliance on US tech"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I puzzles me to no end why the typical office clerk should care about the OS at all.  I understand that secretaries will be trained on MS Word and will then have a strong preference to use such (or at least something which <i>very</i> closely resembles it). Same for accountants with Excel. But clerks in e.g. Revenue Service? Those I expect to interact (perhaps these days via a Web interface) with custom software. Why would those ever see a 'Start' button or somesuch?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 14:02:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718328</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718328</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47718328</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "RAM Has a Design Flaw from 1966. I Bypassed It [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And those memory arrays cannot detect access from the bus?<p>I'm not saying that it's easy or cheap or worthwhile (I'd rather guess it's not in most cases), but I don't see why it couldn't be done.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 12:44:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717277</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717277</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47717277</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "How NASA built Artemis II’s fault-tolerant computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Multiple and dissimilar redundancy is nice and all that, but is there a manual override?  Apollo could be (and at least in Apollo 11 and 13 it had to), but is this still possible and feasible? I'd guess so, as it's still manned by (former) test pilots, much like Apollo.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 10:21:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715931</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715931</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715931</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guenthert in "How NASA built Artemis II’s fault-tolerant computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think he refers to SpaceWire <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceWire" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SpaceWire</a>.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2026 09:49:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715709</link><dc:creator>guenthert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715709</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47715709</guid></item></channel></rss>