<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: gugagore</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=gugagore</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2026 13:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=gugagore" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Julia: Performance Tips"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Have you heard the thought that LLM hallucinations when coding within an API / framework are feature requests against the same?<p>I have a suspicion that Julia, owing to multiple dispatch, has a sort of regularity that makes that you said plausible.<p>Though there is just so much more Python to train on, any I bet they even do RL with validated rewards on Python, and probably not Julia.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2026 10:15:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47178794</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47178794</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47178794</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "We mourn our craft"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Woodworking is, like, the quintessential craft. I think it is very useful to bring it in when discussion "craft"!<p>I am not myself a woodworker, however I have understood that part of what makes it "crafty" is that the woodworker reads grain, adjusts cuts, and accepts that each board is different.<p>We can <i>try</i> to contrast that to whatever Ikea does with wood and mass production of furniture. I would bet that variation in materials is "noise" that the mass production process is made to "reject" (be insensitive to / be robust to).<p>But could we imagine an automated woodworking <i>system</i> that takes into account material variation, like wood grain, not in an aggregate sense (like I'm painting Ikea to do), but in an individual sense? That system would be making judgements that are woodworker-like.<p>The craft lives on. The system is informed by the judgement of the woodworker, and the craftperson enters an apprenticeship role for the automation... perhaps...<p>Until you can do RL on the outcome of the furniture. But you still need craft in designing the reward function.<p>Perhaps.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2026 20:02:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46927261</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46927261</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46927261</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "CES 2026 Worst in Show"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"sound bites pop radio" of 1999 has made a comeback, But worse.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2026 15:18:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46566380</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46566380</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46566380</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Revisiting the original Roomba and its simple architecture"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsumption_architecture" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Subsumption_architecture</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2026 14:23:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46499059</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46499059</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46499059</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "A faster path to container images in Bazel"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For some more depth into the "bloat" of bazel, I like this reference: <a href="https://fzakaria.com/2024/02/27/hermetic-but-at-what-cost" rel="nofollow">https://fzakaria.com/2024/02/27/hermetic-but-at-what-cost</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 22:58:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46380187</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46380187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46380187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Object oriented design in the first 16-bit processor?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Intel's first 32-bit microprocessor was the iAPX 432, which was introduced in 1981, but was not a commercial success. It had an advanced capability-based object-oriented architecture, but poor performance compared to contemporary architectures such as Intel's own 80286 (introduced 1982), which was almost four times as fast on typical benchmark tests.<p>I know that there was OO hype, but 1981 seems kind of early. I also know that OO means many, many things. What does it mean here, if anything?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 01:26:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142681</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142681</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142681</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Object oriented design in the first 16-bit processor?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microprocessor">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microprocessor</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142680">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142680</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2025 01:26:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microprocessor</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142680</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46142680</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[CUDA Ontology]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://jamesakl.com/posts/cuda-ontology/">https://jamesakl.com/posts/cuda-ontology/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45947437">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45947437</a></p>
<p>Points: 271</p>
<p># Comments: 40</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 18:56:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://jamesakl.com/posts/cuda-ontology/</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45947437</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45947437</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Archimedes – A Python toolkit for hardware engineering"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are the 50 for loops truly necessary in the manual C code example of a Kalman filter? At least introduce a few functions (that could be inlined and loop-fused) for some matrix operations?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Nov 2025 15:18:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45945718</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45945718</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45945718</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Why Fei-Fei Li and Yann LeCun are both betting on "world models""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Another way to make the same point is to observe that every single society has language.<p>But only some groups have the ability to systematically encode language as writing.<p>Writing is a technological marvel.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2025 03:47:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45934895</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45934895</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45934895</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Why should I care what color the bikeshed is? (1999)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Does anyone have a reference to the original thread or issue about sleep(1)?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 17:17:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45783408</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45783408</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45783408</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics (2014)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The bug being "perturbation confusion"?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2025 11:09:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45719612</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45719612</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45719612</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "A bug that taught me more about PyTorch than years of using it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the first time I see "SGD" to mean "standard gradient descent" and not "stochastic gradient descent".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Oct 2025 13:36:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45711759</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45711759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45711759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Vibe Coding in the 90s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Please share your understanding!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 10:58:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45702833</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45702833</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45702833</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Julia 1.12 highlights"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We're not using "type theory" the same way, I think. I'm thinking in terms of<p><pre><code>    - simply typed lambda calculus
    - System F
    - dependent type theory (MLTT)
    - linear types
    - row types
    - and so on
</code></pre>
But it's subtle to talk about. It's not like there is a single type theory that underlies Typescript or Rust, either. These practical languages have partial, (and somewhat post-hoc) formalizations of their systems.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2025 10:07:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45525645</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45525645</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45525645</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "Julia 1.12 highlights"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> people who like type systems tend to dislike Julia's type system.<p>This is true. As far as I understand it, there is not a type theory basis for Julia's design (type theory seems to have little to say about subtyping type lattices). Relatedly, another comment mentioned that Julia needs sum types.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2025 23:39:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45521867</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45521867</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45521867</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "It's not a hack to satisfy known requirements"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think of context parameters as a replacement for dynamic scoping.<p>I think it can be all of these things, which in my opinion partially undermines the GP's point.<p>Recommended related musings: <a href="https://wiki.c2.com/?ClosuresAndObjectsAreEquivalent" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.c2.com/?ClosuresAndObjectsAreEquivalent</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2025 20:15:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45476331</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45476331</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45476331</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "UTF-8 is a brilliant design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Also, statefullness. Baudot has two codes used for switching into one of two modes: figures and letters.<p>Typewriters have some statefullness, too, like "shift lock". Baudot needed to encode the actions of a type writer to control it, not the output.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 13 Sep 2025 11:02:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45231093</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45231093</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45231093</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "ML needs a new programming language – Interview with Chris Lattner"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming is not worth knowing." ― Alan J. Perlis</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2025 14:14:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45149431</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45149431</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45149431</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by gugagore in "AI tooling must be disclosed for contributions"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A search for "LLM Harry Potter" would suggest that LLMs are widely understood to be proficient at rote memorization.<p>(I find the example of the computational geometry algorithm being a clear case of direct memorization not very compelling, in any case.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2025 00:53:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44979978</link><dc:creator>gugagore</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44979978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44979978</guid></item></channel></rss>