This has always been the bottleneck. Automated tools love to flag vulnerabilities, but almost all are false positives. These need to be triaged and evaluated by humans. This is okay. I’d rather close a false positive after a careful review than miss it altogether.

I don’t think it’s appropriate for calling out humans as a bottleneck. They are an essential part of the process, I’m sure Mythos will also become a catalyst in the process.

Does this work for anyone outside the US as well? e.g. Will it work for an Australian?

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48157333

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Every account having the ability to invite an only small finite number of new accounts is one way to thwart scammers.

VB for DOS really needed a version 2.0, but it never got it.

I remember saving up for it at high school with my student discount. From memory it was about $120.

For that one country that doesn’t maybe universal healthcare can be an Anthropic model.

Real doctors tend to have a degree of cautiousness. I would rather a real doctor be hesitate and seek more information, than an alarmist LLM suggesting I have cancer.

In my region, quite a few airlines have cut routes citing the fuel crisis. Including Qantas, Virgin Australia, and Air New Zealand. But again, we aren’t seeing widespread cancellations yet.

Surprisingly the doctors involved quickly identified mushrooms as the culprit, despite that the 75% died.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leongatha_mushroom_murders

It was a super interesting court case.

So it’s not optional. At least in Australia.

I think that’s what Apple is banking on. They sell privacy as a feature of their products, and I’m grateful for that.

I think you missed the point. The process creates an identifier, by strongly associating you with the phone number.

This association allows the bank to quickly establish your identity later when you call up or use online services.