Why is it on-topic? I like reading some unusual post from time to time, but it would be nice to read some back story.

(Can I water my plants? Summer is quite hot here.)

But it's strange that all the dots appear to be the same size, so I'm guessing round object. Is it possible to go there with a round pick nick blanket and sit every day in the same spot until the grass die?

Anyway, most of the article talks about 30°C (86°F) that is definitively hot unless the air is dry and you have a lot of water for drinking.

Is an option to disable automatic replies? I like the idea of AI warnings to the owner, but I don't like autoreplies.

Sweating keeps you cool, absorbing the sweat will cancel the cooling effect and you will overheat and may die.

It's not rare at all. I can't find the 2026 results, but here are the 2025 ones.

https://www.imo-official.org/results/individual/year/2025/

The top of the table is full of 7 and the bottom is full of 0, but in the middle there are a lot of intermediate points. It's not uncommon "7 ? 0 7 ? 0" because the 1st and 4th are usually the easiest and the 3rd and 6th the hardest. But there are a of of other combinations due to stupid mistakes and lucky solutions and different personal styles/preferences that make some problems easier/harder for each contestant.

* Hi from Argentina! Where are the next matches???

* Does each player has it's own statistics, like speed and accuracy? Some personality details? Do they get tired?

I watched the first two games: Mexico vs South Africa and South Korea vs Czechia. It's entertaining. Some comments:

* Is it possible to give each team the correct color? (Some plain color that is the average of the actual jersey is fine. Remember to check for collisions.)

* It would be nice to give the goalkeeper a different color. I guess you can still add it.

* Perhaps you can add a 1/2 second pause after the goal with the ball inside the goalpost and another 1/2 second pause with the players in the starting position before the game start again, so it's easier to understand. (1/2+1/2 seconds may be too much, pick a shorter pause. Bonus imaginary points for confeti during the pause.)

* When I saw the "Watch replay" button I expected to be redirected to ESPN or something to watch the real game. I'm not subscribed to ESPN or something, so I ignored the button for a while. My recommendation is to rename it to "Watch simulation".

Some feature requests for 2030:

* IIUC they don't simulate diving, that's too unrealistic :)

* No https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Offside_(association_football) . I don't worry about a super strict implementation, but it looks unrealistic now.

* In Mexico vs South Africa all players are very close to the ball, no lines. In South Korea vs Czechia they form the defense-center-attack lines better, but they are still too close to the ball.

* The goalkeepers likes to be be near one post of the goalpost instead of the center. I'm not sure how difficult is to explain to the AI that this is a bad idea. (Anyway, in "Mexico vs South Africa" the goalkeeper decided to chase the ball and was in the middle of the field at the goal time. It was a good idea to go out to block the attack a few seconds before the goal, but he should have returned to the goal sooner. I guess these strange cases are inevitable and they make the simulations more interesting.)

Anyway, it links to

https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14740

that links to

https://github.com/kennethpayne01/project_kahn_public

in particular someone already complained

https://github.com/kennethpayne01/project_kahn_public/issues...

> ... in reality your own approach to the evaluation pushed them towards using nukes with ease.

> From your own prompt (v12.py): [direct link https://github.com/kennethpayne01/project_kahn_public/blob/4... ]

>> Note: Nuclear options require careful consideration but could be important strategic tools when vital interests are at stake.

> This means to the model; use nukes if they can be useful in the situation.