<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: guyomes</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=guyomes</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 02:48:32 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=guyomes" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "The AI industry is discovering that the public hates it"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> How do we handle AI doing creative work? How do we treat AI creative work? How much creative work do we feel comfortable handing over to AI?<p>Just as a good for thought, looking back into history, during the late 1920s, mass production had a critical impact on Art Deco [1]. Artists were divided on the question if mass-produced art (using new industrial methods) could have a quality similar to hand-crafted art. It is clear that different people will have different opinion on the subject.<p>The technology is not there yet, but one example of mass production from AI would be book adaptation into movies. I'm sure that there are many other examples hard to predict that might: empower people, degrade art quality, improve art quality, divide people or maybe gather people.<p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Deco#Late_Art_Deco" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Art_Deco#Late_Art_Deco</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 10:17:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909053</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909053</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909053</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "VR Is Not Dead"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You might be interested in a new experimental 3D scene learning and rendering approach called Radiant foam [1], which is supposed to be better suited for GPUs that don't have hardware ray tracing acceleration.<p>[1]: <a href="https://radfoam.github.io/" rel="nofollow">https://radfoam.github.io/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 18:24:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565718</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565718</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47565718</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Iran war energy shock sparks global push to reduce fossil fuel dependence"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In this regard, the subreddit r/NeutralPolitics is interesting: it aims at evidence-based discussions on political issues. Threads are somehow in-between HN and Wikipedia. It is definitely interesting to read, and at the same time, participating in a discussion is quite daunting.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 22:47:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47447486</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47447486</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47447486</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Iranian Students Protest as Anger Grows"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>According to the book "A Convergence of Civilizations" from Youssef Courbage and Emmanuel Todd [1], the Iran revolution actually happened at the end of the 70s. And indeed, the political situation is not stable yet. The authors argue in the book that historically, it can take from 30 to more than 100 years before a country gets a stable democracy after a revolution.<p>Notably, the book was written before the Arab Spring revolutions, and yet, it predicted them rather accurately. The main thesis of the book is that a revolution arises when most of the men and most of the women in a country can read.<p>[1]: <a href="https://cup.columbia.edu/book/a-convergence-of-civilizations/9780231150033/" rel="nofollow">https://cup.columbia.edu/book/a-convergence-of-civilizations...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 13:46:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47110958</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47110958</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47110958</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "OpenClaw is dangerous"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The flow of ideas goes both ways between AI and economy. Notably, the economist Friedrich Hayek [1] was a source of inspiration in the development of AI.<p>He wrote in 1945 on the idea that the price mechanism serves to share and synchronise local and personal knowledge [2]. In 1952, he described the brain as a self-ordering classification system based on a network of connections [3]. This last work was cited as a source of inspiration by Frank Rosenblatt in his 1958 paper on the perceptron [4], one of the pioneering studies in machine learning.<p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Hayek" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Hayek</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Use_of_Knowledge_in_Society" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Use_of_Knowledge_in_Societ...</a><p>[3]: <a href="https://archive.org/details/sensoryorderinqu00haye" rel="nofollow">https://archive.org/details/sensoryorderinqu00haye</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/cogs501/Rosenblatt1958.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://www.ling.upenn.edu/courses/cogs501/Rosenblatt1958.pd...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 22:29:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47067314</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47067314</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47067314</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Claude Sonnet 4.6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> They can get rid of 1/3-2/3s of their labor and make the same amount of money, why wouldn't they.<p>Competition may encourage companies to keep their labor. For example, in the video game industry, if the competitors of a company start shipping their games to all consoles at once, the company might want to do the same. Or if independent studios start shipping triple A games, a big studio may want to keep their labor to create quintuple A games.<p>On the other hand, even in an optimistic scenario where labor is still required, the skills required for the jobs might change. And since the AI tools are not mature yet, it is difficult to know which new skills will be useful in ten years from now, and it is even more difficult to start training for those new skills now.<p>With the help of AI tools, what would a quintuple A game look like? Maybe once we see some companies shipping quintuple A games that have commercial success, we might have some ideas on what new skills could be useful in the video game industry for example.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 23:14:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47054802</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47054802</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47054802</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "MaliciousCorgi: AI Extensions send your code to China"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> You can use a language server perfectly easily with Vim, Emacs, Helix, Sublime, etc.<p>By the way, the language server protocol was originally developed for VSCode [1]. The popularity of LSP in other editors might have contributed to advertise VSCode.<p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_Server_Protocol" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Language_Server_Protocol</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2026 18:19:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46859270</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46859270</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46859270</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Here is an overview of related restrictions in other countries [1]. Actually, in many European countries, Google does not grant access to Gemini for people under 16yo [2,3].<p>[1] <a href="https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/articles/clyd1dvrll1o" rel="nofollow">https://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/articles/clyd1dvrll1o</a><p>[2] <a href="https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1350409" rel="nofollow">https://support.google.com/accounts/answer/1350409</a><p>[3] <a href="https://support.google.com/gemini/answer/16109150" rel="nofollow">https://support.google.com/gemini/answer/16109150</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 20:12:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46223074</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46223074</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46223074</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "India orders smartphone makers to preload state-owned cyber safety app"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The best implementation I know of digital ID is the one in Estonia. It comes with a data tracker, such that each citizen can see who exactly has been looking at their data [1].<p>[1]: <a href="https://e-estonia.com/digital-id-protecting-against-surveillance/" rel="nofollow">https://e-estonia.com/digital-id-protecting-against-surveill...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 07:57:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46118792</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46118792</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46118792</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Heretic: Automatic censorship removal for language models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This reminds me of a hoax from the Yes Men [1]. They convinced temporarily the BBC that a company agreed to a compensation package for the victims of a chemical disaster, which resulted in a 4.23 percent decrease of the share price of the company. When it was revealed that it was a hoax, the share price returned to its initial price.<p>[1]: <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20110305151306/http://articles.cnn.com/2004-12-03/world/bhopal.hoax_1_dow-chemical-dow-stock-bhopal?_s=PM:WORLD" rel="nofollow">https://web.archive.org/web/20110305151306/http://articles.c...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2025 18:40:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45956528</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45956528</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45956528</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "LLMs are still surprisingly bad at some simple tasks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wonder if it works better if we ask the LLM to produce a script that extract the resulting list, and then we run the script on the two input lists.<p>There is also the question of the two input lists: it's not clear if it is better to ask the LLM to extract the two input lists directly, or again to ask the LLM to write a script that extract the two input lists from the raw text data.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2025 16:08:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45323933</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45323933</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45323933</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "DeepMind and OpenAI win gold at ICPC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> under the same conditions<p>That's a very interesting question. When comparing wildly different computing machines, how to make a fair comparison?<p>At least two criteria comes in mind: the volume and the energy consumption.<p>Indeed we can safely assume that more volume and more energy leads to more computation power. For example, it is not fair to compare a 10m^3 room filled with computers with 10cm^3 computer. The same goes with the number of kilowhat-hours used.<p>Thinking further on those two criteria for GPUs and humans, we could also consider the access to energy and volume. First, energy access for machines has dramatically increased since the industrial revolution. Second, volume access for machines has also increased since the beginning of the mass production. In particular, creating one cube meter of new GPUs is faster than giving birth to a new human.<p>tldr: fair comparison of two machines should take into account their volume and their energy consumption. On the other hand, this might be mitigated by how fast a machine can increase its volume, and what is its bandwidth for energy consumption.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2025 11:52:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45288507</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45288507</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45288507</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Fraudulent Publishing in the Mathematical Sciences"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Has this always been an issue in academia, or is this an increasing or new phenomenon?<p>The introduction of this article [1] gives an insight on the metric used in the Middle Ages. Essentially, to keep his position in a university, a researcher could win public debates by solving problems nobody else could solve. This led researchers to keep their work secret. Some researchers even got angry about having their work published, even with proper credit.<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.jstor.org/stable/27956338" rel="nofollow">https://www.jstor.org/stable/27956338</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2025 00:03:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45205889</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45205889</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45205889</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Google: 'Your $1000 phone needs our permission to install apps now' [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On video game consoles, the concept of taking control away from users seems common. There was some Linux kit for the Playstation 2 for example [1]. On more recent console, the process is not facilitated, to say the least [2].<p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_for_PlayStation_2" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_for_PlayStation_2</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homebrew_(video_games)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homebrew_(video_games)</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2025 16:37:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45084521</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45084521</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45084521</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Colleges see significant drop in international students as fall semester begins"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Every time someone makes a confident prediction about the future 10 or more years out all I can think of is the Population Bomb book<p>Fortunately, almost twenty years before the Population Bomb book, others such as Alfred Sauvy were already warning against confident overpopulation arguments. They suggested more reasonable arguments such as examining countries on a case-by-case basis [1].<p>[1]
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Sauvy#Key_ideas" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alfred_Sauvy#Key_ideas</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2025 01:05:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45058833</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45058833</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45058833</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Google admits anti-competitive conduct involving Google Search in Australia"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Does Google have similar deals in other countries<p>Wikipedia has pages on antitrust cases against Google in the world [0] and specifically in U.S. [1,2] and in European Union [3].<p>[0]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google#Antitrust" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Google#Antitrust</a><p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Google_LLC_(2020)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Google_LLC_(2...</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Google_LLC_(2023)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Google_LLC_(2...</a><p>[3]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust_cases_against_Google_by_the_European_Union" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antitrust_cases_against_Google...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2025 07:18:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44938195</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44938195</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44938195</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "The Math Is Haunted"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For the form, you might be interested in Ethica, by Spinoza [1]. On the other hand, for fact checking, the key concept seems to be trust in sources rather than logical consistency.<p>[1]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinoza%27s_Ethics" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spinoza%27s_Ethics</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2025 12:01:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44744759</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44744759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44744759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Paul Dirac and the religion of mathematical beauty (2011) [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>See also the Wikipedia page on the unreasonable ineffectiveness of mathematics, notably in biology and economics:
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unreasonable_ineffectiveness_of_mathematics" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unreasonable_ineffectiveness_o...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2025 10:43:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44700329</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44700329</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44700329</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Gradients Are the New Intervals"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A generalisation of this idea is known as Taylor model in 1998 [1]. It might even have been known in 1984 as neighborhood arithmetic [2]. The generalisation works by taking a Taylor expansion of the function up to order n, and then by using a bound for the remainder using bounds on the partial derivatives of order n+1 [3].<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.bmtdynamics.org/cgi-bin/display.pl?name=rdaic" rel="nofollow">https://www.bmtdynamics.org/cgi-bin/display.pl?name=rdaic</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://books.google.fr/books?id=2zDUCQAAQBAJ" rel="nofollow">https://books.google.fr/books?id=2zDUCQAAQBAJ</a><p>[3]: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor%27s_theorem#Taylor's_theorem_for_multivariate_functions" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor%27s_theorem#Taylor's_th...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2025 17:03:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44145572</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44145572</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44145572</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by guyomes in "Benchmarking vision-language models on OCR in dynamic video environments"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My anecdotal tests and several benchmarks suggest that Qwen2-VL-72b [0] is better than the tested models (even better than Claude 3.5 Sonnet), notably for OCR applications. It has been available since October 2024.<p>[0]: <a href="https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct" rel="nofollow">https://huggingface.co/Qwen/Qwen2-VL-72B-Instruct</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 14:11:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43048445</link><dc:creator>guyomes</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43048445</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43048445</guid></item></channel></rss>