<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: haitchfivee</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=haitchfivee</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 02:00:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=haitchfivee" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by haitchfivee in "Gravity seems holographic. What does that mean for reality?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My nitpick is with something the author said in passing about Hawking.
Yes, around 1970 Hawking and the scientific community at large still used to believe nothing could escape a black hole, and between 1971 and 1973 Hawking along with Penrose and others expanded their evolving understanding and consequences of of Albert Einstein's breakthrough work.<p>But then Hawking argued back the opposite case, which in simple terms means that some things can, indeed, escape an event horizon. In fact, name dropping Hawking just to mention his views as they stood before his 1973 work, and his 1974 model of Hawking radiation seems dangerously incomplete journalistic reporting.<p>In 1974 Hawking formulated what we now know as Hawking Radiation, which is the *exact opposite* of what was previously believed about the impossibility of anything coming back from a black hole. Whilst still not conclusively proven as a physical fact, this did win him the Special Fundamental Physics Prize in 2013. specifically for his discovery of Hawking radiation from black holes and his deep contributions to quantum gravity and quantum aspects of the early universe.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 16:42:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846813</link><dc:creator>haitchfivee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846813</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49846813</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by haitchfivee in "Apple is no longer thinking different"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Upstarts who dare to think differently may be able to get a shot, since Apple are no longer confidently occupying that space. The shape of a successful upstart would probably have to unbundle Apple, turning their strength into a liability.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 16:20:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49646280</link><dc:creator>haitchfivee</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49646280</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49646280</guid></item></channel></rss>