<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: harrisoned</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=harrisoned</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 02:19:36 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=harrisoned" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "81yo Dodgers fan can no longer get tickets because he doesn't have a smartphone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There should be more noise about this here, but to whoever you talk about that issue they don't seem to grasp the situation, or simply don't care, and call you crazy/paranoid. I have been told you also need the GOV app for certain things related to companies.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663539</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Discord cuts ties with identity verification software, Persona"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Those require a phone for you to send messages and interact. It will ask you to 'Verify phone', but you can chose not to and stay on the server as read-only, Discord itself won't bother you about it. I am on a few like that for quite some time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:13:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138171</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Discord cuts ties with identity verification software, Persona"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same for me, and my account is almost a decade old. I think it depends a lot where are you from and the kind of activity, as i read stories of people being asked to register a number out of nowhere.
Many servers requires you to have it tho, due to spam protection. I just don't talk on those.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138084</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Wikipedia: WikiProject AI Cleanup"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is very good, but I'm surprised the term "game-changer" is not mentioned there. From my observations this is used a lot in LLM texts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 13:28:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46678759</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46678759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46678759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Meta is using the Linux scheduler designed for Valve's Steam Deck on its servers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They use Perforce.<p><a href="https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Using_Source_Control_with_the_Source_SDK" rel="nofollow">https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Using_Source_Contro...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:46:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368666</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368666</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368666</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Danish postal service to stop delivering letters"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is something that worries me. I know that the laws/constitution that guarantees the rights of somebody may vary from country to country (and may not even be enforced by the letter), but lets say: All commercial companies will have a ToS, data sharing agreements, etc. You, as a user, i assume is not obligated to agree to that ToS at the expense of not using the service. If a government body requires you to use their service to access basic services (and offers no 'offline' alternative) required by law, are they, by proxy, coercing you to accept a commercial ToS? I would very much like to hear a lawyer opinion on this.<p>I know some government may do this with intent, but i imagine many governments simply never thought about it, or no citizen ever didn't accepted a "popular smartphone OS provider's ToS" and challenged that government requirement. I know some make offline alternatives very inconvenient, but that still technically legal.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 11:38:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46353360</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46353360</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46353360</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Look, Another AI Browser"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's exactly what i think it is. Have a legion of users willingly scraping the internet for you, going behind captchas, logins, and all the mechanisms that was put there to stop bots. With this every user user of the browser is also a bot. Now i wonder if the agent string will be something unique, and certain places will just block those browsers from their websites by it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45675954</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45675954</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45675954</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Social Cooling (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's something that drives me crazy as well. I don't actually use the big 'algorithmic social media' sites, only Telegram and Discord mostly, and seeing screenshots/memes with those words censored there made me wonder why, at first. Then i saw people auto-censoring themselves in those places where there's no such thing as algorithmic de-ranking. The social media generation already find it normal, acceptable, and is specially ironic to me that a lot of people who are vocal against those services have conformed to what they say to stand against.<p>That behavior also highlights how people within those services care so much about reach, clout, 'going viral', instead of communicating with other people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:26:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45481318</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45481318</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45481318</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "EU age verification app not planning desktop support"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> At present the project is focused on mobile platforms, specifically Android and iOS, as they cover the vast majority of users and real-world use cases. (..) Desktop support is not currently within the project's scope.<p>This is the equivalent of a "Do you guys not have phones??"[1] but on a way larger scale.<p>At least where i live i am able to use the bare minimum of phones, even working with tech. The friction is increasing though, which worries me a lot, and day after day there is a new attempt to shove it down your throat if you want to be considered a member of society. Seeing that a lot of countries (including mine) are pushing for age verification, and the whole thing about Android blocking 'sideload', by the end of 2026 you won't be considered a human being without a government certified smartphone.<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly10r6m_-n8" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly10r6m_-n8</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45362547</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45362547</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45362547</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "US embassy wants 'every social media username of past five years' for new visas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So this answers my question about not actually having social media. In theory you wouldn't be denied. But as a professional in the field who cares for privacy, and simply has no use for such services, i wonder if they could just assume you are lying and has bad intentions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 13:56:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44355864</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44355864</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44355864</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I noticed that same behavior across older Gemini models. I build a chatbot at work around 1.5 Flash, and one day suddenly it was behaving like that. it was perfect before, but after it always saluted the user like it was their first chat, despite me sending the history. And i didn't found any changelog regarding that at the time.<p>After that i moved to OpenAI, Gemini models just seem unreliable on that regard.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 17:23:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44193757</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44193757</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44193757</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Brazil's government-run payments system has become dominant"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree its an amazing payment method, it worked for me for most of the time. Still, we depend on bank's stability and technical availability for it to work. Once i needed to pay for something and forgot my card at home, at that same time my bank was going trough technical issues and i couldn't pay.<p>Despite rare reliability issues, my fear about it is that it requires a phone. Being so popular, i fear when places will refuse any other form of payments and accept only PIX, making anybody not using a phone unable to buy their products, with the common assumption that everybody uses it ("don't you guys have phones???"). You can't install banking apps on rooted phones or alternative mobile OSs (or is very very hard), so you are trapped with Android or IOs to use it.<p>I hope it doesn't come to that, but it seems it's going that way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 12:31:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43620957</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43620957</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43620957</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Major endometriosis study reveals impact of gluten, coffee, dairy and alcohol"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is. A friend of mine has this. It took her so much time to actually seek help, despite the excruciating pain, and she got part of her digestive system removed because it spread too much.<p>Nowadays, after 2 years of the surgery, she manages it with a restrict and healthy diet, and the pill. It takes a big toll on the well being even after the pain is gone, and she is almost always tired because of it, the body is constantly fighting the inflammation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 23:56:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43597823</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43597823</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43597823</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "'The tyranny of apps': those without smartphones are unfairly penalised"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have a big issue with this, and the truth is that the majority of people simply do not care and/or do not understand the implications.<p>By tying your service to a smartphone your are basically refusing to provide service if the costumer doesn't agree to Apple's or Google's TOS. If the app doesn't complain about emulation or something different than Android or IOS you are in luck, but that's not the case with most banking apps. And that's only talking about people who don't have it by choice and have money to buy one.<p>For me, once, it went beyond: I took my first dose of the Covid vaccine, and the second dose's date would still be announced. I asked where it would be available to the nurse, "On the Instagram page of the <local health body>". "But i don't have Instagram" i said, and the nurse shrugged. It requires both a phone and a social media account with your real info, but since absolute nobody complains about it they just do because it's easier.<p>This will continue as long people are complacent with it. In some places the government is required to provide you services, by law, by any means available and not depending on 3rd party service, but they do require apps anyway and people stay quiet. Phones as an alternative is fine, it's a tool, but should not be an obligatory device for you to be considered an human being.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 14:16:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43139107</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43139107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43139107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Goldman on Generative AI: doesn't justify costs or solve complex problems [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree with that. At work, we are about to implement a decent LLM and ditch Dialogflow for our chatbot. But not to talk directly to the client (it's asking for a disaster), just to recognize intentions, pretty much like Dialogflow but better.<p>Right now there are many small but decent models available for free, and cheap to use. If it wasn't for the hype, it would never have reached that level of optimization. Now we can make decent home assistants, text parsers and a bunch of other stuff you already mentioned.<p>But someone paid for that. The companies who believed this would be revolutionary will eventually have a really hard reality check. Not that they won't try and use it for critical stuff, but once they do and it fails spectacularly they will realize a lot of money went down the drain.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jul 2024 21:45:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40886316</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40886316</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40886316</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "What we've learned from a year of building with LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It certainly has use cases, just not as many as the hype lead people to believe.
For me:<p>-Regex expressions: ChatGPT is the best multi-million regex parser to date.<p>-Grammar and semantic check: It's a very good revision tool, helped me a lot of times, specially when writing in non-native languages.<p>-Artwork inspiration: Not only for visual inspiration, in the case of image generators, but descriptive as well. The verbosity of some LLMs can help describe things in more detail than a person would.<p>-General coding: While your mileage may vary on that one, it has helped me a lot at work building stuff on languages i'm not very familiar with. Just snippets, nothing big.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 01 Jun 2024 22:10:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40549485</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40549485</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40549485</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Recall is Microsoft's key to unlocking the future of PCs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm curious about the ToS. As far as i know, their version of ChatGPT on Copilot don't like +18/sexual stuff, so how would the Copilot+ react to a lot of it? Would you get banned? would it work? Would it simple ignore all the stuff when asked for it?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2024 00:22:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40422433</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40422433</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40422433</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Thefastest.ai"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did that with Llama 3 8B with some stuff i could think of, and it did very good. It was on par with GPT4. I prompted some scenarios and asked it to use CoT. Scenarios like "i was standing and eating chocolate, and it melted. Will i find chocolate at my feet?", and the reasoning was pretty good.<p>But there was something it did way better than GPT4. I asked to create 10 phrases where the last word was an animal, excluding equines, and in alphabetical order. GPT3.5 and GPT4 aren't able to follow such instructions, but the 8b model did it with maestry.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 00:13:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40138916</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40138916</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40138916</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Llama 3 feels significantly less censored than its predecessor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I personally don't use LLMs to code, besides a few snippets or when i'm out of ideas what/how do to. But models like Starcoder and Code Llama is what i see people often using for this purpose. There are benchmarks for various languages, you can find those on Hugging Face.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 21:30:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40101194</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40101194</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40101194</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Llama 3 feels significantly less censored than its predecessor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If your intention is coding something complex, you should try a model finetuned for that, i don't think llama 3 is that good for coding. But i used standart prompt engineering stuff, same as from llama 2. Instead of chat, you use a completion mode, where you just need to give it a text to continue writing from.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Apr 2024 02:25:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40094122</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40094122</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40094122</guid></item></channel></rss>