<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: harrisoned</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=harrisoned</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 02:36:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=harrisoned" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Unauthorized alert sent to cell phones across Brazil"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"PIX will be discontinued today"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2026 22:21:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48613539</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48613539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48613539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "It is time to build a new internet"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In the late 2000's/early 2010's that started to pick up where i live, and it was referenced (even by the government itself with it's social programs) as 'digital inclusion', where technology products where subsidized and made more accessible (dumbed down) to the general public, for the reason you mentioned on your third paragraph.<p>While this was in a time when PCs where the main and only thing for most to access the internet, in my opinion this problem really took shape as smartphones got popular. They where shaped to adapt to a low-level of tech literacy, and lock you in instead of actually providing knowledge to the user. Facebook then went in, and then Whatsapp. Whatsapp was a fun one because carriers made it free of charge, the push to the masses was insane, and nowadays you are questioned and looked at weird if you say you don't have a Whatsapp account.<p>That trend is what broke most of the social interactions and services on the internet for me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2026 03:32:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231667</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231667</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48231667</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (May 2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have been working for some time on a budget body/facial mocap solution with Unity. Mocap is hard, and what exists is locked behind subscriptions or is just very expensive.<p>With Unity I'm trying to bundle a bunch of different free, cheap or open source solutions together. For facial, that includes a custom converter from the output of Deadface (based on Mediapipe) with ARKit blendshapes, and also eye movement. For body it's a custom hook to SlimeVR that allows you to mocap with cheap-ish IMU-based DIY trackers, and all that on top of a custom made (not free but open source) physics rig solution that gives you accurate rigid body real time collision, saving on cleanup work.<p>It's being going really nice despite being an unusual workflow. Hope to release it as a plugin for a in-development sandbox game in the near future. Mocap and animation has been my passion long before i started with tech stuff, and finally I'm able to pursue it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2026 19:23:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086971</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086971</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48086971</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Smoking ban for people born after 2008 in the UK agreed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Ah, smoking is not good for you, and it's been deemed that anything not good for you is bad; hence, illegal" — Demolition Man, 1993</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 15:36:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47850336</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47850336</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47850336</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "AI chatbots could be making you stupider"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For you, no. For the services you depend on and will continue receiving your data, and may jack up the prices/add limitations knowing that your dependency won't be easily broken, yes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 13:10:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848304</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848304</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47848304</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Banned by Anthropic?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>All this look so dystopic to me. Even without assuming all those are real (which i doubt), i have heard similar stories from friends and others. The level of dependency people are getting from those services is surreal.<p>I was thinking the other day, "since social media is kinda wearing off, could 'LLM As A Service' be the new addictive thing for the masses?" because i'm hearing horror stories of people who are outsourcing their brains, in some cases their feelings, to those services, and i personally saw a case of a 'high level professional' asking an LLM how it should respond to somebody in real time during a Whatsapp conversation. It is in fact a drug, and it tricks you very well into thinking you should rely on it.<p>Also when reading this piece (<a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790041">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47790041</a>) earlier, i thought about it again. Nowadays instead of searching for something and being forced to learn, those services spoon-feeds contents of dubious accuracy for everybody, which will not only cause trouble for them eventually, but also creates a stream of revenue based on people's cognitive laziness, to not use harsher words.<p>Social media is/was bad and it relied on a similar mechanism, but i feel this is much worse. People crying as if their brains where took away is proof of that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 00:40:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829092</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829092</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47829092</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "US Bill Mandates On-Device Age Verification"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is tiring. The text is so vague, and if a big country adopts it software companies will comply, and there's no reason to why smaller ones wouldn't, since 'the work is already done'.<p>I wonder if it would be illegal for an user to use an outdated system without those functions when they roll out, or to use outdated applications, or to distribute outdated applications, or to keep mirrors of multiple versions of operating systems. I doubt they thought that far, or if they care at all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:01:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804577</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804577</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47804577</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "81yo Dodgers fan can no longer get tickets because he doesn't have a smartphone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There should be more noise about this here, but to whoever you talk about that issue they don't seem to grasp the situation, or simply don't care, and call you crazy/paranoid. I have been told you also need the GOV app for certain things related to companies.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 16:57:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663539</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47663539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Discord cuts ties with identity verification software, Persona"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Those require a phone for you to send messages and interact. It will ask you to 'Verify phone', but you can chose not to and stay on the server as read-only, Discord itself won't bother you about it. I am on a few like that for quite some time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:13:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138171</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Discord cuts ties with identity verification software, Persona"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same for me, and my account is almost a decade old. I think it depends a lot where are you from and the kind of activity, as i read stories of people being asked to register a number out of nowhere.
Many servers requires you to have it tho, due to spam protection. I just don't talk on those.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 15:06:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138084</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138084</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47138084</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Wikipedia: WikiProject AI Cleanup"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is very good, but I'm surprised the term "game-changer" is not mentioned there. From my observations this is used a lot in LLM texts.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 13:28:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46678759</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46678759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46678759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Meta is using the Linux scheduler designed for Valve's Steam Deck on its servers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They use Perforce.<p><a href="https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Using_Source_Control_with_the_Source_SDK" rel="nofollow">https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Using_Source_Contro...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 19:46:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368666</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368666</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46368666</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Danish postal service to stop delivering letters"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is something that worries me. I know that the laws/constitution that guarantees the rights of somebody may vary from country to country (and may not even be enforced by the letter), but lets say: All commercial companies will have a ToS, data sharing agreements, etc. You, as a user, i assume is not obligated to agree to that ToS at the expense of not using the service. If a government body requires you to use their service to access basic services (and offers no 'offline' alternative) required by law, are they, by proxy, coercing you to accept a commercial ToS? I would very much like to hear a lawyer opinion on this.<p>I know some government may do this with intent, but i imagine many governments simply never thought about it, or no citizen ever didn't accepted a "popular smartphone OS provider's ToS" and challenged that government requirement. I know some make offline alternatives very inconvenient, but that still technically legal.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 11:38:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46353360</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46353360</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46353360</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Look, Another AI Browser"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's exactly what i think it is. Have a legion of users willingly scraping the internet for you, going behind captchas, logins, and all the mechanisms that was put there to stop bots. With this every user user of the browser is also a bot. Now i wonder if the agent string will be something unique, and certain places will just block those browsers from their websites by it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2025 22:26:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45675954</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45675954</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45675954</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Social Cooling (2017)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's something that drives me crazy as well. I don't actually use the big 'algorithmic social media' sites, only Telegram and Discord mostly, and seeing screenshots/memes with those words censored there made me wonder why, at first. Then i saw people auto-censoring themselves in those places where there's no such thing as algorithmic de-ranking. The social media generation already find it normal, acceptable, and is specially ironic to me that a lot of people who are vocal against those services have conformed to what they say to stand against.<p>That behavior also highlights how people within those services care so much about reach, clout, 'going viral', instead of communicating with other people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Oct 2025 13:26:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45481318</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45481318</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45481318</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "EU age verification app not planning desktop support"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> At present the project is focused on mobile platforms, specifically Android and iOS, as they cover the vast majority of users and real-world use cases. (..) Desktop support is not currently within the project's scope.<p>This is the equivalent of a "Do you guys not have phones??"[1] but on a way larger scale.<p>At least where i live i am able to use the bare minimum of phones, even working with tech. The friction is increasing though, which worries me a lot, and day after day there is a new attempt to shove it down your throat if you want to be considered a member of society. Seeing that a lot of countries (including mine) are pushing for age verification, and the whole thing about Android blocking 'sideload', by the end of 2026 you won't be considered a human being without a government certified smartphone.<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly10r6m_-n8" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ly10r6m_-n8</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2025 16:21:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45362547</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45362547</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45362547</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "US embassy wants 'every social media username of past five years' for new visas"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So this answers my question about not actually having social media. In theory you wouldn't be denied. But as a professional in the field who cares for privacy, and simply has no use for such services, i wonder if they could just assume you are lying and has bad intentions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 13:56:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44355864</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44355864</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44355864</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Gemini-2.5-pro-preview-06-05"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I noticed that same behavior across older Gemini models. I build a chatbot at work around 1.5 Flash, and one day suddenly it was behaving like that. it was perfect before, but after it always saluted the user like it was their first chat, despite me sending the history. And i didn't found any changelog regarding that at the time.<p>After that i moved to OpenAI, Gemini models just seem unreliable on that regard.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2025 17:23:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44193757</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44193757</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44193757</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Brazil's government-run payments system has become dominant"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree its an amazing payment method, it worked for me for most of the time. Still, we depend on bank's stability and technical availability for it to work. Once i needed to pay for something and forgot my card at home, at that same time my bank was going trough technical issues and i couldn't pay.<p>Despite rare reliability issues, my fear about it is that it requires a phone. Being so popular, i fear when places will refuse any other form of payments and accept only PIX, making anybody not using a phone unable to buy their products, with the common assumption that everybody uses it ("don't you guys have phones???"). You can't install banking apps on rooted phones or alternative mobile OSs (or is very very hard), so you are trapped with Android or IOs to use it.<p>I hope it doesn't come to that, but it seems it's going that way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Apr 2025 12:31:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43620957</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43620957</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43620957</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by harrisoned in "Major endometriosis study reveals impact of gluten, coffee, dairy and alcohol"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is. A friend of mine has this. It took her so much time to actually seek help, despite the excruciating pain, and she got part of her digestive system removed because it spread too much.<p>Nowadays, after 2 years of the surgery, she manages it with a restrict and healthy diet, and the pill. It takes a big toll on the well being even after the pain is gone, and she is almost always tired because of it, the body is constantly fighting the inflammation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Apr 2025 23:56:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43597823</link><dc:creator>harrisoned</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43597823</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43597823</guid></item></channel></rss>