None the less, the Pi is still faster and physically smaller. If I’m spinning up lots of them for test scenarios having the pi as a platform still is really handy.

But absolutely. The Jetson is brilliant. The Pi is none the less a fantastic platform.

I think so of the reactions toward the Pi here are a bit harsh. The price hike is not their fault, it’s all the AI companies that will continue to suck your tax dollars and give them to billionaires. Raspberry Pi have done an astonishing job for the whole communities and we should be thankful for that company.

https://youtu.be/k3ZRFHmEh-g?si=eNy3PUaHo_txMkBa

It's a new mandated feature.

When I observe its reasoning I see it doing this all the time.

15,000,000 euros fines for all tech companies in Europe :-)

And I also don’t believe those two times they were a threat to the horses, more likely just curious. But I didn’t have the full visibility enough to be sure as there was just one camera. So I called the farmer to be in the safe side.

Now I think there are no more wolves there. It’s been weeks since Insaw them. They have either dispersed or killed on the roads.

Looking the other way for a really long time results in crazy situations.

So I'm just a little empathy would be well placed here. A little effort to try and co-exist with the other inhabitants would not be out of place and as a bonus you can think a little better of yourself.

The systems I developed are. It based on microcontrollers. But secure boot Linux systems. They detect wolves within 2 seconds on pi based version, sub second on the jetson based ones.

Then websocket connected subscribers speak a loud alert to wake the person up and auto load the camera view over the permanently up VPN.

The person monitoring can then verify on how ever many cameras are connected and illicit many different kinds of responses.

This is not a standard wild camera setup. I’m using high resolution 640x512 res thermal modules to see night and day.

Our system is already being used in Greenland for polar bears and has detected bears three times now from a long distance and the safety group were able to chase it away. There it’s monitoring 22 cameras with a single jetson.

And indeed, the idea is very rapid detection and validation and then potentially remote active response. It has all the necessary controls.

Both times I alerted the farmer who went out in his car and then a little while later they dispersed.

In the Netherlands there are 14 wolf packs and 144 wolves in a geographical small area where the surrounding farms are often full of a lot sheep.

But it’s also easy to imagine that if you can become aware of the presents of wolves sufficiently early enough and reliably enough before they attack your animals then you have a chance to prevent an attack. And if you prevent enough attacks it becomes maybe harder than sticking to natural prey.

Wolves don't like taking risks. Interacting with humans is definitely risky. Detecting wolves reliably early and responding, either in person if that can be done quick enough, or setting off responses, ideally followed up by a human visit could well result in the wolves avoiding that farm in any case. The extend to which this can work in practice is something that needs to be determine through research and pilots. Wolves are very smart, so if tech is going to be able to help here, then the tech has to be very capable. The start with pilots and research two elements are needed. People with tech, but also people in the affected areas with a willingness to collaborate.

The current highly polarized environment is throwing road blocks against such collaboration.

The current situation is such that owners are unaware of the presence of wolves at their borders, so there is currently also not a lot of perceived risk associated with attacking live stock. A useful goal is to start to change that. And the people who read hacker news I'm sure that think of many ways to change the status quo. My system is one example.

Sadly, a lot time went by without trying these methods. None the less, one should try.

I the past I have offered free equipment to people to test who had been publicly expressing concern about the arrival of the wolf but they would not accept it.

But maybe that can still change.

And no, it's not a glorified trail camera. Very different.

Everyone wants to kill before trying measures to keep people and their animals apart.

I don't think you can say it does nothing to help people live with wolves because it's not being tried. It's not being tried, because people being convince the only thing that helps is killing everything that requires a bit of effort to live with. I realize it's very human to destroy and kill, but I think we should strive to do better.

Humans have already stolen so much from nature and the animals, don't you think a little effort to do better would be a good thing?

https://wildlifesecurityinnovations.com/projects/wolves-belg...

With the most wolf videos here.

https://youtube.com/@hcftube1

We have a solar powered thermal local AI wolf detection system that’s been in a field in Belgium for more than 8 months now, monitoring the wolves there. Thermal image motion detection can detection them at much greater distances than PIR sensors and of course in complete darkness.

The biggest barrier at the moment to living with wolves, if you true away the human resistance to the idea, is reliable detection for early warning prevention.

This is not such a hard problem with computer vision at the level that it is these days. We’ve made it more effective by coupling it with thermal imaging camera modules.

Now we just need people willing to want to want to work with such pilot project, which turns out to be a pretty big problem.

However, it’s possible that a few influential success stories can bring change to the situation. But there has to be a start first and certainly when this started to be a problem, anything along the lines of prevention was seen as a barrier towards killing them which is what the solution in many people’s eyes is.

To see all that and still be programming now is one very lucky journey.

What country are you from ? There’s a list of countries that we can ship to (Only whole systems as that’s our product). 640 resolution requires export licenses for us to countries outside of the EU. We apply for those for our customers. You will need to supply end user statements and identify who you are.

The modules we ship have 25 fps frame rate.

The UK is in the list of countries we can ship to. It is outside of the EU so we would need to apply for an export license for you.

384x288 resolution does not require an export license for us to ship to the UK. But it does require an end user statement.

However, if the UK also requires an import license, then I have no advice for you here. Interesting to know though, as it would complicate exporting to there.