I got that feeling just seeing the title use "native" as a synonym of "not a website".

I for one enjoyed the article and understand what you're getting at.

I feel this. Social media algorithms can be so complex and opaque now that I have to consciously consider what repercussions my interactions have. I have so little idea what interactions affect recommendations on e.g. Instagram that it almost feels random.

I don't know how people do it. I can only figure it's my fault for running Linux or Firefox or not Signing in with Google™, upsetting the data harvesting overlords.

1. Input must be valid UTF-8. 2. stdin is read to EOF instead of being read incrementally

Neither are ideal and can make ut unfit for a fair few use cases.

Oh, yes, you did: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44656840

[0] https://github.com/lipanski/docker-static-website

The straw that broke the camels back was a bug in `podman compose` that funnily enough was fixed two hours ago[1]; if `service1` has a `depends_on` on `service2`, bringing down `service1` will unconditionally bring down `service2`, even if other services also depend on it. So if two separate services depend on a database, killing one of them will kill the database too.

Another incompatibility with Docker I experienced was raised in 2020 and fixed a few months ago[2]; you couldn't pass URLs to `build:` to automatically pull and build images. The patch for this turned out to be a few lines long.

I'm sure Podman will be great once all of these bugs are ironed out, but for me, it's not quite there yet.

[1]: https://github.com/containers/podman-compose/pull/1283

[2]: https://github.com/containers/podman-compose/issues/127

this is not true as it is not what "legal tender" means. Legal tender is something that the government must accept as payment, not private enterprise.

> Businesses don’t have to accept cash.[0]

> There is no federal statute mandating that a private business, a person, or an organization must accept currency or coins as payment for goods or services.[1]

[0]: https://www.accc.gov.au/consumers/buying-products-and-servic...

[1] https://www.federalreserve.gov/faqs/currency_12772.htm

> Using Czech police records, American and Czech researchers compared rape rates in the Czech Republic for the 17 years before porn was legalized with rates during the 18 years after. Rapes decreased from 800 a year to 500. More porn, less rape.

> In addition, the legalization of porn was associated with a decrease in another despicable sex crime, child sexual abuse. Under Communism, arrests for child sex abuse averaged 2,000 a year. After porn became legal, the figure dropped by more than half to fewer than 1,000. More porn, fewer sex crimes.

The country's entire foundation shifted from underneath it; an empire collapsed around it. How could they possibly isolate the legalisation of pornography specifically as the cause of decreased rape? Why not the legalisation of private enterprise? Is it not feasible that living in a repressive, controlled, surveilled society caused men unrest?

Perhaps the studies cited went into more detail, but "Lots of rape in 1985, less rape in 2005. Porn was legalised between then, ergo porn caused this." does NOT convince me.

That seems really wrong to me?

1. Business flyers are getting paid for the day, wherever they are. Whether they spend an extra hour in the office or at an airport is orthogonal to them getting paid. They may be producing less output which in turn decreases GDP, but that's its own can of worms and also not what this is trying to calculate anyway.

2. Leisure flyers, naturally, fly when either their business is closed or they've taken time off. So again, whether they leave at 2AM or 4AM, they're not getting paid for that day.

I don't think the layman would end up with any more money in their pocket were they to leave 2 hours later for their flights.

cryptography?