My argument was not about AI. Rather about the practice of Anthropic and the likes.

It occurred to me an outright rejections of these tools is brewing but can't quite materialise yet.

I often compare with Gemini. Sure those Google servers are super fast. But I can't see it better. Qwen and deepseek simply work better for me.

Haven't tested Mistral in a while, you may be right.

People try out and feel comfortable: using U.S models (I can see the logic), but mostly for brand recognition. Anthropic and OpenAi are the best aren't they? When the models jam they blame themselves.

Catchy subject seemingly target to me. Same for content.

But you are right, it's more likely enough users marked them as spam that Google algorithm decided the source is the spam.

To add the fact we are being taken for fools with dramatic announcements, FOMOs messages. I even suspect some reaction farms are going on to boost post from people boasting Claude models.

These don't happen for codex. Nor for mistral. Nor for deepseek. It can't just be that Claude code is so much better.

There are open weight models that work perfectly fine for most cases, at a fraction of the cost. Why are more people not talking about those. Manipulation.

It's also in the interest of the users to keep certain params private, we are meant to deduce that. Did you not ?

Once people won't be able to think anymore and business expect the level of productivity witnessed before, will have no choice but cough up whatever providers bill us.

It costs him more in ingredients alone than he charges. He even offers some pseudo unlimited buffet, combo sets, and happy hours.

He announced a new restaurant, apparently it will be even better, so good he's a bit worried. He makes sure to share his worries while he picks a few select enterprise for business parties and the likes.

In the meantime he cracks down on free buffet goers who happen to eat too much, and downgrades all ingredients without notice to finally hope to make a profit.

Edited.

It all boils down to a brilliant but extremely expensive technology. Both to build and to run.

We've been sold a product with heavy subsidy. The idea (from Sam) scale out and see what happens.

Those who care to read between the lines can see what's happening. A perfect storm of demand that attract VCs who can't understand they are the real customers. Once they understand that it will be too late.

Regarding open weight models: eventually we will, as humanity, benefit from the astronomical capital poured into developing a technology ahead of its time. In a few years this and even more will run on edge.

Written by open source developers, likely former openai and anthropic employees who got so much cash in the bank they don't need to worry about renting their knowledge.

Regarding moat, I doubt the logic behind a server would prevent anyone to copycat game concept and graphics. Games have always been cloned as community remakes, with little recourse to take them down.

Edit: I added due credit. thanks for pointing that out.

https://orbitup.surge.sh/

- FPS tweak to fix variable speed - Can bounce - Life points instead of sudden death - Levels - A few effects - Better adjusted difficulty

Ok on touch gravity of the orbiting takes off. And if I don't land the next I start again and get prompted for my email each time.

It reminds me of certain games on NES which could be played for hours, once you lose your 3rd life you start all the way from the beginning.

Here it's the same. With one life.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GendBuntu

Sure AI can do styling though.