<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: hkleppe</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=hkleppe</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 19:03:15 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=hkleppe" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "GitHub Actions down again today"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've started spending each github outage planning our move to an alternative. I guess I'm not alone. Where are you all moving?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2026 12:39:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278964</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278964</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48278964</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "Cursor Introduces Composer 2.5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"No moat", well...<p>How I see this is that its so important to bundle the model with the right tooling.<p>Like a racecar, having the best engine doesn't help if the rest of the car lacks other winning properties (reliability, aerodynics etc).<p>So for Cursor, which IMO, they put themself in a strong position by having both a solid IDE __and__ a solid+cost efficient model. Those two working great in combination for the task they are designed to solve (coding) is more important than benchmarks</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2026 06:29:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189937</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189937</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48189937</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "Why so many control rooms were seafoam green (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>aha, so I need more karma</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 10:32:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540960</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540960</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540960</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "Why so many control rooms were seafoam green (2025)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>what, can I change the topbar color?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2026 10:30:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540949</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540949</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47540949</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "How good engineers write bad code at big companies"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You have to realise there is a almost full complete disconnect between engineering and business value</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Nov 2025 22:03:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46083179</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46083179</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46083179</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "Trans-Taiga Road (2004)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Relatively long distances of road and power transmission lines to reach the two most remote locations. Especially considering they seem to be limited in capacity (only 319 and 469MW).<p>Curious to know if something bigger was in the plans, or perhaps the road also have/had other uses?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2025 11:18:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44453848</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44453848</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44453848</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "Will low and no code tools ever truly disrupt tech development?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I see it differently.<p>I see the low-code stuff as an opportunity to let the business-folks handle the usecases where the complexity is low, and value of rapid iteration with deep domain-knowledge is more valuable.<p>Also, they might get a better understanding of why the code stuff might make sense when stuff is actually getting complicated :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:51:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32426608</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32426608</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32426608</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "Will low and no code tools ever truly disrupt tech development?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> My main issue with low-code/no-code is that it attempts to solve the complexity problem, without understanding what "complexity" is.<p>I get your point. But without low/no-code tools I would argue a lot of simple workflows have to be implemented using code. These usecases, where the technology-side is simple, is a good fit for low/no-code platforms IMO</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2022 14:46:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32426527</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32426527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32426527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "A Twenty-First-Century Shipwreck"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For a different perspective, have a look at this post. A statement posted by Team Vestas navigator Wouter Verbraak once they got back to civilization:<p><a href="http://sailinganarchy.com/2014/12/04/walking-tall/" rel="nofollow">http://sailinganarchy.com/2014/12/04/walking-tall/</a><p>Wouters statement was since removed from his facebook-page</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2014 08:26:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8733776</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8733776</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8733776</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hkleppe in "IPv6 Support Required for All IP-Capable Nodes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not really. But you can tell your ISP it is not RFC compliant, I will tell mine.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 13 Apr 2012 20:15:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3838654</link><dc:creator>hkleppe</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3838654</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3838654</guid></item></channel></rss>