People really can’t wait to be the next Zynga

More accurately it would be like calling it Alphabet, since that takes its name from Alpha Beta (AB) just like the Futhark takes its name from the first letters in it.

To be quite fair, this is pretty much the only reason Ubuntu exists. It started off as "Debian for people who just want stuff to work", but these days Debian even ships non-free wifi drivers on the install media. I've personally used both extensively and apart from the "enterprise support" argument and the minor convenience of having ZFS pre-compiled, I see no reason to use Ubuntu.

A good first question to ask yourself is why you need to run it on dozens of boxes. You probably don't.

The point of Docker is not "I just want to run my program", the point is to bundle an application with its dependencies. It's one way to distribute applications, and far from the only one (despite what talking to some people might make you think).

As for the last part of your post, none of it is correct. Docker is not a "second linux to worry about" and considering unikernels in your use case is insane.

Terry Davis once said that "an idiot admires complexity, a genius admires simplicity". You say you're "getting ready to launch an online game", then launch it. The best way to do that is the simplest way, which in my opinion is running it as a systemd service on _one_ Linux VM. When that actually creates problems for you, solve those problems, and only those problems.

My gut feeling is that enterprise sentiment is leaning heavily towards Proxmox, fuelled by a VMware exodus that will only gain speed, and I don't see Incus really meeting the requirements most people have that previously used VMware, but of course Incus is awesome and you can't always pick technologies by what will be "employable" :-)

Is this supposed to be a joke? Is the author expecting users to travel back in time and use a VPN so their IP is scrubbed from logs that will get published at any time, because that's something the author just obviously has the right to do?

> The EDPB explicitly identifies IP addresses as being personal data due to their ability to identify individual data subjects.[1]

Dickhead.

[1]: https://techgdpr.com/blog/is-an-ip-address-considered-person...

As I said, it's a nice idea but I have a feeling the complexity behind making this work well is what might have kept them from doing it.

Setting it up like this where you just assume:

> The public key tells us the user, and the {user, IP} tuple uniquely identifies the VM they are connecting to.

Seems like begging for future architectural problems.

If you set this up once ("this" meaning adding networking, SSH and tailscale inside initramfs), you can just do the same thing for the next server you set up, and you don't have to worry about the failure of one node affecting the other(s).