<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: hollerith</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=hollerith</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 08:59:50 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=hollerith" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "I Remain a Skeptic"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I used to like computers and technology, then I realized AI is really dangerous. Getting back on topic, I admit that AI is very useful and will become much more so between now and when it kills us all or permanently dis-empowers us in some other way.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 13:51:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320074</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320074</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49320074</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "The Problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That would be relevant if the OP were warning about the dangers of <i>LLMs</i>. There's plenty of research going on into machine-learning models that aren't LLMs. Also, the models we think of as LLMs aren't pure LLMs anymore: about 25% of the compute used to train them is spent on reinforcement learning. A lab is free to use any technique it wants in creating or improving a model.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 23:48:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315411</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315411</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315411</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "The Problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>130 years ago, nobody knew that uranium-235 or plutonium could be used to make a bomb. There might be things laying around in our environment that can be turned into weapons, but we have no knowledge of the relevant science, so we won't think to safeguard it. If a group of AIs discover the relevant science before we do, then it can use it against us.<p>This is one of many examples of the general truth that if some entity or group is better at science and at long-range planning than people are, that entity or group is a threat to people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 23:46:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315404</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315404</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49315404</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "The Problem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Doesn't matter much because people care quite a bit about the planet, so if advanced technology liberates people from most of the constraints they currently live under, the planet will do very well. (Dogs, cats, seals, foxes, etc, should do particularly well.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 17:24:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312434</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312434</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312434</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "Jason Arday, ex-Cambridge professor at centre of plagiarism row, found dead"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>Why should someone not be shamed if they do things shameful ? Trying to understand your logic here.<p>His logic is probably, "arguments are soldiers": the enemy is trying to make my side look bad; neutralizing that enemy action takes priority over everything else.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 14:24:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310841</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310841</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49310841</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "How Organizations Use AI: Evidence from ChatGPT [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>There's a reason that people don't like engaging with you . . . nobody wants to fucking talk to you.<p>He has 708 times as much karma as you have, which would be impossible if no one wanted to read his comments.<p>I saw your comment because I follow him, not vice versa.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 03:24:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307289</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307289</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307289</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "Going Dark, and the era of law enforcement hacking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Quirky and adorable!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:17:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305760</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305760</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305760</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "As AI eats the web, the internet’s collective memory is disappearing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>Aliens was Alien fanfiction<p>Just because an established Hollywood director was a <i>fan</i> of the first Alien movie does make his script for Alien's sequel "fan fiction".<p>Cameron had already written and directed The Terminator when the owners of the Alien franchise chose his script for the sequel.<p>(Fifty Shades of Grey in contrast really did originate as fan fiction.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 23:34:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49265938</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49265938</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49265938</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "As AI eats the web, the internet’s collective memory is disappearing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When I started on the internet, Dec 1991, there were basically no ads. It stayed that way till ads starting appearing on the web, probably in 1994 or maybe 1993.<p>The internet in Dec 1991 was already the largest computer network in the world according to some author back then. Certainly it was very very big.<p>Let me describe what ads or ad-like things there were.<p>Companies would announce job openings. These announcements were restricted to a few newsgroups such as ba.jobs and could not announce independent contractor openings: while it was okay to announce an opening for an <i>employee</i> (W2) or for an individual to announce his availability for employment, it was against the rules for a company to announce an opening for an independent contractor (1099) or for an independent contractor to announce his availability for work -- that was considered too much like commercial activity and was kept off the internet, which had almost no rules in the early 1990s, but one clear rule, consistently enforced, was, no commercial activity.<p>The job announcements stayed nicely contained (namely, restricted to newsgroups whose names ended in ".jobs") such that a person wouldn't encounter them unless they went looking for them.
What did not stay nicely contained were announcements of academic conferences. When I was reading comp.lang.lisp, I could not avoid encountering announcements for many academic conferences on various programming-related topics even if they weren't about Lisp. And these announcements were repeated often (weekly or even more frequently).<p>But as far as anything ad-like, job announcements and conference announcements are all I can remember, and again only the conference announcements were obtrusive.<p>I heard that the proprietary online services like Compuserve and Prodigy had successfully argued in Washington that it was unfair for private enterprises to have to compete with a government-subsidized service (namely, the internet) and extracted a commitment from Washington that any commercial activity would be kept off the internet.<p>Again, there were almost <i>no rules</i> on the internet of 1991 and earlier. Tim Berners Lee for example did not need to get anyone's permission to start the web: he just wrote a web client, stood up the first web server and announced their availability. People acted like complete assholes on Usenet, and there was no way to rein them in. Pedophiles openly exchanged practical advice on how to target and exploit children on alt.sex.pedophilia. But one clear rule was <i>no commercial activity</i>, e.g., no selling, no trading and certainly no advertising.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Aug 2026 12:43:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49257392</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49257392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49257392</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "The AI Apocalypse Is Here"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just because we can't stop it completely doesn't mean we can drastically slow it down: make it illegal to study to be an AI researcher, to train someone to be a researcher, to seek investment for AI development, to invest in AI development, to sell services based on AI models other than the ones that already exist, to publish new findings about AI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Aug 2026 05:06:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49228599</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49228599</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49228599</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "Nashville uses eminent domain to block data center near zoo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You wouldn't be worried about constant noise from the chillers?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2026 15:16:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49211755</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49211755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49211755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "Ten advances in mathematics and theoretical computer science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Someone conjectured that every organization that doesn't have opposing Leftism as its mission will eventually be run by Leftists.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 01:48:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177649</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177649</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177649</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Good point, but China's generals were <i>trained by</i> generals with experience in a proper war, which is not nothing. Specifically, Beijing sent 3 million Chinese soldiers to assist Pyongyang in evicting the US Army and its allies from North Korea.<p>An invasion of Taiwan would entail a large naval component, though, and China really has zero experience in naval warfare even if you accept my assertion that there would be some value in having admirals trained by admirals trained by admirals with experience in a proper war.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 01:19:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177462</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177462</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177462</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The atmosphere of coastal California (i.e., where most Californians live) has about one tenth the capacity to dilute pollutants as the atmosphere of most of the rest of the US (because inversions are common especially in the summer). Air quality in coastal Southern California was awful back when California used the same gas the rest of the country did.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 01:05:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177372</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "U.S. used 'virtually all' of its long-range precision missiles during Iran war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I understand why war with Iran would raise gas prices, but why would war with China?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2026 01:02:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177355</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177355</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49177355</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "Our position on open-weights models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>China can at least so far be relied upon to not shoot itself in the foot<p>It can? Have you heard of the Great Leap Forward? The Cultural Revolution? Either of those damaged the metaphorical foot more than anything the US has ever done.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 20:05:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160742</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160742</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49160742</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "The Math Superstar Who's Terrified of AI–and Just Took a Job at OpenAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Here's a list of 20 researchers and managers that would need to be fired according to you. My guess is that there are hundreds, possibly thousands, of researchers and managers employed at the labs who didn't sign this statement for fear of being ostracized by their colleagues.<p>It's one of those "single-page apps", so I cannot link directly to the "AI company" tab: the reader would have to follow my link, then click that tab.<p><a href="https://superintelligence-statement.org/" rel="nofollow">https://superintelligence-statement.org/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 03:42:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49150975</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49150975</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49150975</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "Anatomy of a Frontier Lab Agent Intrusion: A Timeline of the July 2026 Incident"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The "paperclips" were never actually paperclips (at least not to the originator of the word-picture, Yudkowsky) but rather tiny molecular squiggles which <i>are</i> a physical manifestations of the MAXINTs you refer to. In other words, tiling the future light cone with molecular squiggles is (according to Yudkowsky) a likely result of the AI's engaging in wireheading if the AI is free to re-arrange reality however it likes because it is able to overcome any human opposition. In other words, there's no particular reason for the wireheading process to remain tidily contained inside the hardware the AI is running on: it might in contrast result in a vast field of "paperclips" centered on where Earth used to be.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 17:46:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146610</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146610</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49146610</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "The great wealth transfer reality check"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>>you can easily improve acoustic performance of drywall in many ways. Double layering, acoustic sealing caulk, rockwall in walls, etc.<p>There's a principle-agent problem here. It is hard for a home buyer to verify claims of the existence of the things you list whereas lath and plaster is easy for a non-professional to learn to recognize. Lath and plaster also is better at forming curved surfaces. (I'm a particular fan of coved ceilings.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2026 00:04:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49139815</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49139815</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49139815</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hollerith in "The great wealth transfer reality check"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If drywall is better than lath and plaster, then why is lath and plaster still used today -- in high-end construction?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2026 23:10:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49129529</link><dc:creator>hollerith</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49129529</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49129529</guid></item></channel></rss>