I don't think so, it was a big leap forward in terms of creativity, imagination, rigor and experimentation. Einstein was able to "run" visual thought experiments inside his mind

Totally agree, but afaik we are a very small minority. My tinfoil hat theory is that all of this is intentional to keep monopolies and making it impossible to compete in the browser space

Ehm no, added type safety, and dealing with a type checker it's exactly what agents need.

> if no human is coding

Nope outside the bubble there are many still hand coding(me too)

> I guess it will be soon that typescript won’t matter anymore since agents will be writing code is Rust

Oh hold on a second isn't Rust the same as Typescript "adding human readability"?! Why not trashing Rust and just have LLMs output WASM directly? XD Wasm which is basically useless outside the browser or some microvms on the edge, and in the browser you don't even have an interface for directly rendering anything and still have to deal with the dom

You either are highly non technical, very junior or I just don't know

To me it's just crazy of how dumb it is to test an idea with a vibecoded shitty app. I'm not saying it should be perfect from day zero, let's pretend we are talking about cakes, how crazy it would sound you will tell people to try and judge your new idea of a cake you don't even know how it taste or what's inside?

I'm ok with vibecoding scripts, I love programming the machine and making the end user happy and not dealing with bash! I don't judge scripts quality as long as they are tools in the workflow, I dont care about that, unless they will somehow be part of the production. The name Script implies that, there isn't any architecture and Claude Opus sucks at architecture

I'd love to genuinely love these blog posts but they are all the same! They're all like "now that machine are better than us $xyzargument". I'm so pissed off when I read so blantant lies like AI "writing code better than me" maybe better than you! But in general it's just a big lie.

> the economics of purely hand-written code have changed

who are you to know? I still hand code and produce a lot of value because I do care and polish everything I do. There are some pieces of the software that I wrote that I never touched again, they work perfectly, no errors no customer complaints

Then we will soon forget how our airplanes works

The lies of this decade. Hopefully we will heal sooner than later

One point worth mentioning is this:

> This is how I see the future of software is going to be like. Programs will be too complex to evaluate, humans will have forgotten how to write code, and the only way left is something similar to psychology as a "science" that tries to evaluate in a sandbox poking kind of way how software works.

I don't want this, and I'm pretty sure you don't want it too, like no one sane would like to have planes software written in this way. Also since you mentioned psychology I think your vision is a bit too much biased towards sci-fi, it reminds me a lot of blade runner/neuromancer and so on :) I think reality won't be as much spectacularly dystopic as in these novels.

Anyways, tangential, I've been a ui programmer for much of my life(games, web and mobile) any suggestion for where to start in reverse engineering? I have some interest in the matter

> Have you ever felt joy watching a sunset? Smelling a flower? Hearing a song? Seeing a child laugh? Did you create any of those things?

What has to do with prompting? you don't prompt for experiences like that, we are lucky that we live in a world full of authentic unexpected experiences. WTH has to do with prompting.

> 1.5 Only activities that involve creation can lead to joy.

Exactly, joy and meaning, like basically ALL psychiatrist and what not they're telling us since the start of the 21st century.

If you happen to like something that got out of a prompt, then imo you're a mediocre who doesn't know better, the same that listen to shit music, movies, games and what not. The same miserable mediocre that doom scrolls social, ingest fake news, propaganda and ai slop and doesn't know better.

I'm not saying mediocre as derogatory term to the person it's just what it is.

Convenience not shortcuts, they're very different.

> Compilers are shortcuts to creativity. So are IDEs.

I argue that they're not shortcuts, but convenient ways for making you more productive. And compilers made use productive 1000x not AI that allegedly made us 10x(and it's actually not)