I think, in the right hands, this could be huge.

Going out foraging and being able to identify plants and fungi by simply resting my vision on something for a pause is the sci Fi tech I actually want

I think that horrifies people.

Couldn't have said it better

What would be more interesting is a thought on modern alternatives. Something that ensures employees retain some iota of power in the economy.

What is it? What would it look like?

When I went to college I got my ass kicked by being forced to do difficult things the hard way (to grossly over simplify my education) which in turn gave me a level of intellectual independence.

There is certainly theatre to universities and I agree the models are broken for what they are used for, but for the institutions that are truly challenging students, the answers are not the point. The challenge is.

AI removes that challenge and creates nothing but a dependency. That's the real issue here, not the failings of higher Ed

In a way I miss it because it was such a social thing to do. I have zero interest in smoking any more but the rituals around it were nice

If you have not reached that level as a firm, a good and recent pen test does the trick.

We originally tried a named entity recognition-based approach with the goal of tracking entities, attributes, and relationships across the manuscript. We benchmarked on 96 novels from Project Gutenberg with various inconsistencies injected into each one, then ran the "The Guardian" layer across them to ferret them out. Unfortunately this presented 2,500 false positives across 96 novels, so ~26 false positives a novel. It's not technically bad but it's enough to become an unreliable nuisance of a feature

For our next approach, we instead opted to build our own model, which we call "Confucius". This is a purpose-built narrative world model that sits underneath the entire analysis layer.

It consists of five structures which I'm just lazily copying and pasting from our docs here: PropertyGraph — entities as nodes, relationships as weighted edges, co-occurrence counts CausalDAG — setup/payoff chains, unresolved narrative threads IntervalTree — precise word-position intervals for every entity (where is each character in the manuscript at every point) FenwickTree — entity density over word position, O(log n) range queries Trie — fuzzy entity lookup, name variants, partial matches

Confucius is passive in that it only knows what you tell it via an event emission system. We then slot in an LLM for the extraction layer. We tested three approaches for said LLM

1. NER Only

2. Local GGUF Model only

3. Anthropic Haiku Only

NER, in any combination, made things worse, it was low detection and generated the same high number of false positives. GGUF resulted in 100% detection, with zero false positives, and likewise for Anthropic

So based on this, we opted to ship with 3 tiers - heuristic only (no AI required, but basic surface metrics), local GGUC (Qwen3, ~500mb one-time download which enables full Guardian features), or a managed API subscription (Haiku on our key)

We're certainly proud of the result, but unto itself its been a fascinating journey as we surface additional features with each model refinement (e.g. "voice fingerprint" is our newest - essentially the consistency of the characters voice over the span of the book)

We've got a kickstarter going to help fund refinements and model expenses[1], and a roadmap for additional apps down the line which we'll have on the main site[2]. We'd love for folks to try out the app so we can get some real user feedback for UI/UX refinements so please do check out the demo, or just ping us on the side

1. https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/laotzustudio/laotzu-wri...

2. https://www.redwoodrhetorica.com/

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48147310

Points: 4

# Comments: 0

My kids do not need to see beheadings and exploding people. I could have done without that exposure. It was certainly traumatic.