Just dont actually measure either of these. I'm a bit afraid to talk important things in front of iphones given their atrocious security record.

Also you mentioned quality, but I don't see any CUDA/Nvidia on their platforms. They might advertise quality, but they are closer to B- quality. Please forget the butterfly keyboard white-washing campaign or 'you are holding your phone wrong'.

A Fedora Cinnamon Atomic would be a wet dream for me. I'm surprised that wasnt prioritized. Budgie Desktop looks interesting.

Its what I ended up doing.

Really makes me wonder if chatGPT4 could have given me the same answer if I could roll seeds a few times or change the invisible preprompt.

We have 2 online AI that can do logic now, 0 offline :(

If you are only looking at objective metrics, Apple is always going to perform at B and C levels.

If you are looking at fanaticism, they are A++.

Even chatgpt says they are the best company of all time at marketing.

I mean I have a crappy 7 year old CPU that I use for single threaded dev, and it works for 99% of cases. In the 1% of cases, I threw on multithreading and its fine.

Now my daily driver has a GPU and it unlocks new possibilities.

Its been over 10 years since I've really spent time thinking about a CPU.

And these companies pump the marketing and psychology tricks to an 11/10.

We could use objective quality metrics, but that would embarrass these groups. Why is it all of these groups are not the objectively the Top? They are B- when you use objective metrics.

Has this ever been true? Or maybe its true, but the games are so mediocre that no one cares that 'Pong doesnt have any bugs'.

Fedora? Yes please.

LibreOffice is downright terrible, please do not lump it into a problem of OS replacements. I'm 100% convinced there is some M$ plant that deliberately makes the GUI bad. I still use it, and I use Google's.

Woah what a reactionary! No ballpoint pens, right?

>2028 the effects of the tech ban were apparent, in mere years, the productivity of this countries students had dropped well below global levels. Graduates the year before were becoming first class citizens as inequality became based on the year you were born.

I'm certain these brands advertise they have quality, but I think they fall far short of the competition constantly. Nintendo? Disney? Apple? When I think of their actual quality compared to the best in the business you are talking B- quality.

Sure you never get a C or a D like when I get a random Android phone for $100, but you are never going to get a Baulders Gate 3 from Nintendo.

Although now that you mention it, all of these brands have total fanatics that border on cult worship. I wonder if this is natural, or some unethical psychology their marketing departments use.

I don't really buy into these anti-society articles anymore.

What does this mean?

Also how'd you get your first business?

Isnt this good for a workplace policy?

Wife had to do something similar and I'm happy it was overfit. I don't want some creative policy book.

Why is an AI noob upvoted? When the author makes low tech skill claims, I wonder why this made it to the front page.

The person missed the AI train, they decided instead of adapting, they would just Boo it.

Psychology is insane. And I'm still offended that the packaging/initial presentation was 10x better than the actual phone. The actual phone(2018) felt like I went into a time machine 5 years prior, less features, buggy, slow. Within 1-2 weeks I felt cheated.

I wonder how many people can wake up from the illusion.

I love to go to the park with my kids. I love going to parties.

I don't like sitting in my car unpaid to do work that doesnt require sitting in the car unpaid.