If, in the context of cooperating together, you say "should I go ahead?" and they just say "no" with nothing else, most people would not interpret that as "don't go ahead". They would interpret that as an unusual break in the rhythm of work.

If you wanted them to not do it, you would say something more like "no no, wait, don't do it yet, I want to do this other thing first".

A plain "no" is not one of the expected answers, so when you encounter it, you're more likely to try to read between the lines rather than take it at face value. It might read more like sarcasm.

Now, if you encountered an LLM that did not understand sarcasm, would you see that as a bug or a feature?

If a distributed file system is useful, then a properly architectured one is 100x more useful and more performant.

We need a kernel native distributed file system so that we can build distributed storage/databases on top of it.

This is like building an operating system on top of a browser.

I haven't tried it for coding. I'm just talking about regular chatting.

It's doing something different from prior models. It seems like it can maintain structural coherence even for very long chats.

Where as prior models felt like System 1 thinking, ChatGPT5.2 appears like it exhibits System 2 thinking.

I would not understand the last two sentences. Sidle? Tromp? I don't think I've seen these words enough times for them to register in my mind.

"Strode", I would probably understand after a few seconds of squeezing my brain. I mean, I sort of know "stride", but not as an action someone would take. Rather as the number of bytes a row of pixels takes in a pixel buffer. I would have to extrapolate what the original "daily English" equivalent must have been.

- Hosting a website is not so easy for the average person, even the tech savvy person, specially if you try to learn it now using the way large websites are developed.

- Static site blogs lack interactivity: people can't comment on your blog. You have to post a link to Twitter or HN (here!) and interact with people over there.

- Static site blogs also don't usually let people "subscribe" by email or whatnot, so unless people bookmark your website or follow you on Twitter, they are not going to find your content.

P.S. this is a problem area I'm trying to work on, at least on the technical front.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45991519

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45818101

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

GPUI is not "native OS widgets".

The turning point might have been Heroku? Prior to Heroku, I think people just assumed you deploy to a VPS. Heroku taught people to stop thinking about the production environment so much.

I think people were so inspired by it and wanted to mimic it for other languages. It got more people curios about AWS.

Ironically, while the point of Heroku was to make deployment easy and done with a single command, the modern deployment story on cloud infrastructure is so complicated most teams need to hold a one hour meeting with several developers "hands on deck" and going through a very manual process.

So it might seem counter intuitive to suggest that the trend was started by Heroku, because the result is the exact opposite of the inspiration.

https://judi.systems/sprouts/

Current version focuses on static site hosting, with templates and zero-config localhost preview, one button to publish changes live.

Part of making this project involves creating a GUI framework for Go

https://judi.systems/slay/

Using flexbox-like layout system, it can render UIs for desktop apps in pure go (without using html/js/css).

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45428592

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

ok, you think it's a promising field and you want to explore it, fine. Go for it.

Just stop pretending that what these models are currently doing is good enough to replace programmers.

I use LLMs a lot, even for explaining documentation.

I used to use them for writing _some_ code, but I have never ever gotten a code sample over 10 lines that was not in need of heavy modifications to make it work correctly.

Some people are pretending to write hundreds of lines of code with LLMs, even entire applications. All I have to say is "lol".