<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: hugeBirb</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=hugeBirb</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 00:53:24 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=hugeBirb" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "It used to be hard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes I know. There's no nuance on HN. I was using it as a metaphor to show that this person has no idea what they're doing. Which is a huge difference from someone deeply knowing the codebase and tech it'll sit on to make an educated tradeoff. I've seen the duct-tape in real codebases and I knew the engineers who put it there and why. That doesn't exist when your senior engineer is a nebulous "idea of an engineer" that resets its memory every few hours.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 15:02:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542320</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542320</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542320</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "It used to be hard"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What type of applications are y'all seeing from LLMs? Anecdotally the only thing that has changed for me is the ability to output more code. That's not software. My coworker is a 10x vibe-coder and his flagship application is held together with brittle shell scripts, a sloppy codebase, bad abstractions, piles of markdown files and an ouroboros of generated tests. This is not software. This is just held together with duct tape and a prayer. Although this guy doesn't have any traditional background but still, if LLM generated coding agents were so good even a simpleton like himself should be able to create a miraculous piece of software, right?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 14:50:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542148</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542148</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48542148</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "AI uses less water than the public thinks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You are a deeply unserious person :'D</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:51:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980145</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980145</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980145</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "AI uses less water than the public thinks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Bob: "I hate <company> and what they're doing to this cute fluffy animal I would like to do things to stop that"<p>Tom: "Well actually they're not nearly as bad as <other company> to said fluffy creature and if you actually cared about fluffy creature you'd only focus on them"<p>Great argument. Hate to be the one to tell you this but, two things <i>can</i> be true at once.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 20:41:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980018</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980018</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47980018</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "I built a Game Boy emulator in F#"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure if this is the one you are talking about but I remember seeing this a little while ago. 
<a href="https://mtmc.cs.montana.edu/" rel="nofollow">https://mtmc.cs.montana.edu/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2026 19:07:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47966883</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47966883</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47966883</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "Claude Design"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah, slopper is hilarious. Too long has the title of builder just been an excuse to make dog shit UI and excusing yourself. If you're going to build user-facing tools, good UI/UX is a requirement not an option. Couldn't imagine this excuse flying in any other industry. Yeah I just made a chair where all 4 legs are different lengths and the back rest is in the middle of the seat, "I'm just more of a builder"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 17:20:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808288</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808288</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47808288</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "Hypothesis, Antithesis, synthesis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not that it matters at this point but the hegelian dialectic is not thesis, antithesis and synthesis. Usually attributed to Hegel but as I understand it he actually pushed back on this mechanical view of it all and his views on these transitory states was much more nuanced.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2026 15:55:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504565</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504565</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47504565</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "Cows can use sophisticated tools"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I fear a motorcycle blasting down my street at 10pm. What's the difference. 
Once my cats realized the robo vac won't hurt them they don't even move for it anymore... Seems intelligent to initially be terrified of something and update your perception of it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 19:55:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46683668</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46683668</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46683668</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "Cows can use sophisticated tools"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Having spent my entire life around cows I can say there's a great deal of evidence that cows are quite intelligent. Most of the time when people say they're dumb it's because they're hindering a human from forcing them to do something. Why should a cow "know" to go one way or the other or to not stop in a chute, or to not back up...these are just human constraints. We know what we WANT the cow to do and if they don't do that they're dumb. Sure I've seen cows do dumb things. If I was an outside observer looking at  the severity and frequency that humans do dumb things I would come to the same conclusion, they're dumb.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 18:27:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682662</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682662</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682662</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "Cows can use sophisticated tools"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Idk I guess that's really up for you to decide. My opinion is that behavior seems very uhhh instinctual? Like if they were eating something that was running away from them I'm sure they would employ a similar tactic/behavior. Thing far away from me I need it closer. The logical steps to use a tool that would have 0 instinctual context seems leaps and bounds more "complex". I'm no animal/evolutionary scientist, just my opinion. It very well could be!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 18:15:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682506</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682506</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682506</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "Cows can use sophisticated tools"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe that's why they try to sleep directly on my neck every night. Always plotting something</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 18:06:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682394</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682394</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682394</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "Cows can use sophisticated tools"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"This behavior is quite common..."  is very misleading. This specific behavior is <i>not</i> common. Scratching an itch does not equal using a tool to scratch an itch. Every animal I've seen in nature knows how to use external static objects to help them scratch somewhere they can't reach. Dogs cats, bears, pigs, cows... etc. I think my cats are very intelligent, I've seen them use the bristle brush attachment we have on the wall to scratch themselves. If I ever watched one of them pick up a fork with their mouth and orient it in a way to scratch their back I would absolutely lose my mind. These are not the same behaviors.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 17:58:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682283</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682283</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46682283</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "alpr.watch"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What an idiotic opinion</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2025 17:36:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46291484</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46291484</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46291484</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "“Captain Gains” on Capitol Hill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is so naive. No amount of money could force me to work for a company I didn't agree with morally, if I am able to "command" a higher salary I can command it elsewhere. And less susceptible to bribery? I can guarantee you that someone bringing in ~ $200k a year doesn't need to be looking for other sources of income. What do they tell poor people? Stop buying starbucks? Pull yourself up by the bootstraps! Shame they'd have to live a less lavish lifestyle as a public servant :( So at this point we should have to beg people and incentivize them with astronomical salaries to not be a piece of shit? I think this is just the product of late stage capitalism. Nobody gives a fuck about anything besides money and how to get more of it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 18:55:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46138429</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46138429</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46138429</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "“Captain Gains” on Capitol Hill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"trying to evaluate...". Normal people aren't trying to evaluate becoming a politician. It's a lifelong career for most people and you think the lunch lady or librarian who constantly gives back to their community was evaluating on "becoming" a politician? The financial incentives should be lowered. Pay them like you pay a school teacher and ban insider trading. Then you wouldn't have all these worthless nepo babies who just want a lax job and power over people in these positions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 15:34:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46135671</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46135671</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46135671</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "“Captain Gains” on Capitol Hill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Braindead to think salary is somehow attached to morality. I would say some of the most immoral people are people with a lot of money, and there are countless examples of that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 14:31:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46134882</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46134882</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46134882</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "“Captain Gains” on Capitol Hill"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why would we pay them more? The people who are in Congress for the money are the exact type of people I don't want in Congress.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2025 14:23:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46134798</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46134798</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46134798</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "SlopStop: Community-driven AI slop detection in Kagi Search"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The nice thing that I've found with Kagi is the AI summarization has to be intentional. Sometimes I don't care and just want a simple answer to a search type question tossing a question mark at the end is a super simple way to interact with that feature when I want to</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Nov 2025 19:39:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919520</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919520</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45919520</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "CSS's problems are Tailwind's problems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is an extremely limiting view. They are both CSS at the end of the day. If extracting the complicated inline TailwindCSS class to its own vanilla CSS class makes sense for readability then what's the harm? You could also just define your own variables. Tailwind gives you full control to do this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:37:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44649588</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44649588</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44649588</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by hugeBirb in "CSS's problems are Tailwind's problems"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't understand the point of the rule sets and constant classes? TailwindCSS still obeys the same specificity rules of CSS so instead of `font-medium` on every <a> tag under nav why not just put `font-medium` on the parent <nav> tag?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 16:29:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44649441</link><dc:creator>hugeBirb</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44649441</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44649441</guid></item></channel></rss>