This always confuses me - don't people want their computations to run as fast as possible and thus inevitably produce more heat that needs to be vented?

I suppose sometimes it is just an analogy for "its utilizing 100% of my resources" (which I'm guessing it is here), but I've definitely had people say it as an actual complaint in different contexts

Not sure how attached these sites are to their specific brand/domain (or if this is indirect where main sites link to other sites that host the video)

The preview is 530x300px on a 1920x1080 screen vs the image shown being 336x188px

How this passed any sort of QA is beyond me

What should we call this.. mmh..

"Do Not Track" is a bit long, maybe we just shorten it to DNT?

Nah thats dumb. /s

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/DN...

> Unity has a package called Entities Graphics, but surprisingly Cities: Skylines 2 doesn’t seem to use that. The reason might be its relative immaturity and its limited set of supported rendering features

I'd hazard a guess their implementation of whatever bridge between ECS and rendering is not capable of LODs currently (for whatever reason). I doubt they simply forgot to slap on the standard Unity component for LODs during development, there's got to be a bigger roadblock here

Edit: The non-presence of lod'ed models in the build does not necessarily mean they don't exist. Unity builds will usually not include assets that aren't referenced, so they may well exists, just waiting to be used.

Exactly.

If unity actually delivered a workable graphics pipeline (for the DOTS/ECS stack, or at all keeping up with what UE seems to be doing) these things probably wouldn't be an issue.

user installs the game on their pc? unity wants the fee paid for that

same user installs it on their laptop? pay again

same user upgrades their pc and has to install the game again? unity wants their install fee

I believe they also initially said that deinstall + install would incur another charge, but backpeddalled there (weird)

The article you linked covers this as well:

> while more than 1 million of their premises are also being served by “full fibre” FTTP using the older Radio Frequency over Glass (RFoG) approach to ensure compatibility between both sides of their network.

As for them going symmetric in the future: I'll believe it when they do, not holding my breath

You'd also want to calibrate your monitor accordingly of course

The 99% pay for the 1% that actually uses the unlimited traffic

Can't have your cake and eat it too.

The difference here is that megacorps use legal loopholes (and pay accountants and lawyers plenty of money to find those loopholes and make sure they are allowed) to avoid paying tax while the single mother probably thinks she can get away with not doing it while she may be obligated to

You can't go after companies for follwing the law, you'd have to change the law first.. which I don't see happening personally

Edit: Don't get me wrong - I'm all for making things easier for small businesses to enable them to grow

only to be pushed into spam and plain rejected by "non-mainstream" email providers regardless

That'll also make you more relaxed during interviews (if you do bad/ask for too much the stakes are lower)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26659815

Points: 1

# Comments: 0