Hacker News: ibejoeb

New comment by ibejoeb in "Show HN: sllm – Split a GPU node with other developers, unlimited tokens"

ibejoeb — Sat, 04 Apr 2026 19:28:09 +0000

It depends on how it's implemented. If it's a fixed window, then your absolute ceiling is tokens/windows in a month. If it's a function of other usage, like a timeshare, you're still paying for some price for a month and you get what you get without paying more per token. There's an intrinsic limit based on how many tokens the model can process on that gpu in a month anyway, even if it's only you.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Why the US Navy won't blast the Iranians and 'open' Strait of Hormuz"

ibejoeb — Wed, 01 Apr 2026 13:01:55 +0000

> they're losing Iran war.

What criteria are you using for this assessment?

New comment by ibejoeb in "Microsoft: Copilot is for entertainment purposes only"

ibejoeb — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:55:46 +0000

They unironically relaunch it as XBox Copilot tomorrow...

New comment by ibejoeb in "Artemis II is not safe to fly"

ibejoeb — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:49:59 +0000

Yeah that's the second part. So do they intend manufacture these en masse? If not, why not bite the bullet and manufacture it to spec, since it seems like the honeycomb is integral to the performance? Even if they do, what are we going to do with some number of deeply flawed craft?

New comment by ibejoeb in "Claude Code users hitting usage limits 'way faster than expected'"

ibejoeb — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 15:00:18 +0000

> BUG 2: every time you use --resume, your entire conversation cache rebuilds from scratch. one resume on a large conversation costs $0.15 that should cost near zero.

I use it with an api key, so I can use /cost. When I did a resume, it showed the cost from what I thought was first go. I don't think it's clear what the difference is between api key and subscription, but am I believe that simply resuming cost me $5? The UI really make it look like that was the original $5.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Artemis II is not safe to fly"

ibejoeb — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:50:12 +0000

It's certainly about their lives, but it's also about not tanking the program due to catastrophic failure. The astronauts are going to do it regardless of the risk.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Artemis II is not safe to fly"

ibejoeb — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:46:13 +0000

I'm pretty much with you. The fraud and waste is infuriating. But, frankly, what is the point of this program? At the risk of not being skeptical, can't we say that we conquered lunar orbit in the 1960s? I don't understand why this is some enormous scratch R&D project.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Artemis II is not safe to fly"

ibejoeb — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:31:42 +0000

I don't know anything about this program, so here's a basic question: why does manufacturing need to be easier? Are they intending to mass produce these craft?

New comment by ibejoeb in "Artemis II is not safe to fly"

ibejoeb — Tue, 31 Mar 2026 09:06:10 +0000

How reliable is this information?

Just out of curiosity, do we know if the honeycomb method worked before it was deemed too labor intensive? Because I'm told that using this block method results in chunks blowing out.

I'm also having a problem with this set-up: Apollo is at the upper size limit for avcoat; Orion is way bigger; use avcoat.

Reading a real front-fell-off aura from this project. It makes me wonder if spending 6% of GDP to develop and run a crewed lunar program 60 years ago and then immediately destroying the evidence, r&d artifacts, and materials fab capabilities was a good idea.

New comment by ibejoeb in "The best networking intro I've ever seen is this DICOM presentation [video]"

ibejoeb — Mon, 30 Mar 2026 19:28:49 +0000

I stumbled across this video a few years ago and recently found it again from my history. It's got under 30,000 views and about 500 likes. Just sharing because, in my opinion, it deserves some attention. In about 30 minutes you'll understand the essentials of the OSI model.

The best networking intro I've ever seen is this DICOM presentation [video]

ibejoeb — Mon, 30 Mar 2026 19:23:48 +0000

Article URL: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DJsnan19EmM

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47578589

Points: 3

# Comments: 1

New comment by ibejoeb in "Meta and YouTube found negligent in landmark social media addiction case"

ibejoeb — Thu, 26 Mar 2026 15:25:03 +0000

I don't think that you can practically expect to tax speech.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Apple Business"

ibejoeb — Tue, 24 Mar 2026 20:04:25 +0000

It's not apparent that this apple mdm will do internal distribution or just provide for encouraging a set of installed apps already on the app store. If it does, that would be the biggest reason for me to jump to the free product.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act"

ibejoeb — Thu, 19 Mar 2026 18:35:25 +0000

We're talking about an American bill. I'm glad your government is abiding by its laws, though.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act"

ibejoeb — Tue, 17 Mar 2026 19:09:11 +0000

I agree with everything you said when considering your caveat that the government needs to act lawfully and in good faith. I also appreciate that you have probably dealt directly with similar matters. Since the government has demonstrated that it won't comply, though, I am unwilling to go in that direction, and I guess in that way we see it differently.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act"

ibejoeb — Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:03:23 +0000

They're not equally bad. You can disagree, but you'll have to convince me by argument. I've already laid out mine.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act"

ibejoeb — Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:47:46 +0000

Same. Proof of eligibility is furnished on delivery, just like it is now.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act"

ibejoeb — Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:27:43 +0000

Microsoft is not going to let you continue using Windows 10 under any circumstances.

New comment by ibejoeb in "Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act"

ibejoeb — Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:18:45 +0000

I don't understand the fascination with pretending. System A is bad. System B is worse. System B theoretically shouldn't exist yet it does and there's nothing you can do about it, so now you're advocating for B. What's the rationale?

New comment by ibejoeb in "Meta Platforms: Lobbying, dark money, and the App Store Accountability Act"

ibejoeb — Tue, 17 Mar 2026 16:07:13 +0000

A simple question with a simple answer: as it has done since the inception.

If a kid wants to sneak some porn, he's going to have to hide his digital nudeymag under his digital mattress, and when it's discovered, he'll have to accept his fate as decided by his parents.