<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ibreakphotos</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ibreakphotos</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 00:15:28 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ibreakphotos" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[Update to the “Samsung space zoom moon shots are fake”]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://old.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11p7rqy/update_to_the_samsung_space_zoom_moon_shots_are/">https://old.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11p7rqy/update_to_the_samsung_space_zoom_moon_shots_are/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35123389">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35123389</a></p>
<p>Points: 234</p>
<p># Comments: 122</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2023 17:43:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://old.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/11p7rqy/update_to_the_samsung_space_zoom_moon_shots_are/</link><dc:creator>ibreakphotos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35123389</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35123389</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ibreakphotos in "Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the proof"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>OP here again.<p>I photoshopped one moon next to another (to see if one moon would get the AI treatment, while another would not), and managed to coax the AI to do exactly that.<p>This is the image that I used, which contains 2 blurred moons: <a href="https://imgur.com/kMv1XAx" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/kMv1XAx</a><p>I replicated my original setup, shot the monitor from across the room, and got this: <a href="https://imgur.com/RSHAz1l" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/RSHAz1l</a><p>As you can see, one moon got the "AI enhancement", while the other one shows what was actually visible to the sensor - a blurry mess<p>I think this settles it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Mar 2023 06:55:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35117509</link><dc:creator>ibreakphotos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35117509</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35117509</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ibreakphotos in "Samsung “space zoom” moon shots are fake, and here is the proof"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hey all, it's the author of the reddit post here. First of all, let me say that I don't usually frequent HN, but the comments on here are of such high quality, that I might need to change that. I got semi-depressed on reddit, with people misattributing statements and, in general, not being overly, uh, skeptical :)<p>That being said, there were a few comments on here about gaussian blur and deconvolution, which I would like to tackle. First, I need to mention that I do not have an maths/engineering background. I am familiar with some concepts, as I've used deconvolution via FFT several years ago during my PhD, but while I am aware of the process, I don't know all the details. I certainly didn't know that the image that was gaussian blurred could be sharpened perfectly - I will have to look into that. In fact, I used gaussian blur to redact some private information (like in screenshots), and it's very helpful to know if I haven't redacted anything and the data is recoverable. Wow.<p>I would love to learn more about the types of blur that cannot be deconvoluted.<p>However, please have in mind that in my experiment:<p>1) I also downsampled the image to 170x170, which, as far as I know, is an information-destructive process<p>2) The camera doesn't have the access to my original gaussian blurred image, but that image + whatever blur and distortion was introduced when I was taking the photo from far away, (whatever algo they are using doesn't have access to the original blurred image to run a perfect deconvolution on)<p>3) Lastly, I also clipped the highlights in the last example, which is also destructive (non-reversible), and the AI hallucinated details there as well<p>So I am comfortable saying that it's not deconvolution which "unblurs" the image and sharpens the details, but what I said - an AI model trained on moon images that uses image matching and a neural network to fill in the data.<p>Thank you again for your engagement and your thoughtful comments, I really appreciate them, and have learned a lot just by reading them!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Mar 2023 23:08:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35113738</link><dc:creator>ibreakphotos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35113738</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35113738</guid></item></channel></rss>