<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: idea0rbit</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=idea0rbit</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:18:48 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=idea0rbit" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by idea0rbit in "Ask HN: What Are You Working On? (March 2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m building an observability system that tries to surface answers instead of making people dig through huge amounts of raw telemetry.<p>The basic idea is that when one failure fans out across 20 services, you often end up with 20 alerts and 20 separate investigations, even though there is really just one root cause. I’m using distributed tracing to build a live model of how errors propagate through the system, and then exposing that context directly at each affected service.<p>Longer term, I want this to become a very high-precision RCA engine. Right now I’m looking to try it with a few early design partners that already have a lot of tracing data, especially OpenTelemetry or Datadog APM users. I'll love to chat with some folks who would be willing to try it out!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2026 02:22:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304144</link><dc:creator>idea0rbit</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304144</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47304144</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by idea0rbit in "Ask HN: Why is observability so broken, and what can fix it?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You are absolutely right. What could an alternate design and business model look like?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 23:29:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45563035</link><dc:creator>idea0rbit</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45563035</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45563035</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by idea0rbit in "Ask HN: Why is observability so broken, and what can fix it?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>both. In general I think most observability systems are broken. This article captures the sentiment pretty well<p><a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/observability-broken-its-time-build-something-better-ani-saraf-hoxpc/" rel="nofollow">https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/observability-broken-its-time...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 03:17:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45554883</link><dc:creator>idea0rbit</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45554883</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45554883</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Why is observability so broken, and what can fix it?]]></title><description><![CDATA[

<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45554696">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45554696</a></p>
<p>Points: 6</p>
<p># Comments: 5</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2025 02:39:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45554696</link><dc:creator>idea0rbit</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45554696</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45554696</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by idea0rbit in "Why is observability so broken?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>After a decade building large-scale systems at Google, Datadog, and Meta, I’ve noticed the same pattern repeat: observability keeps getting louder, costlier, and less useful.<p>We’re drowning in telemetry but starving for insight. The industry incentives are misaligned: they reward ingestion and storage, not intelligence.<p>I recently started an open, collective movement called omji.ai to explore a fundamental shift: measuring insight per dollar of telemetry stored. We need to push vendors and internal teams toward intelligence, not ingestion.<p>I’m curious to hear from folks facing the pain - how do we fix this? We need practical, non-obvious ideas.<p>1. What technical or economic levers would actually shift the industry's focus from volume to intelligence?<p>2. Has anyone in a large organization tried benchmarking observability systems based on insight (e.g., MTTR impact) vs. telemetry cost?<p>3. How could open collaboration (tools, standards, benchmarks) make this practical for every engineering team?<p>Full background post: <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/observability-broken-lets-change-industry-together-omji-ai-o7ubc" rel="nofollow">https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/observability-broken-lets-cha...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 20:47:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45543609</link><dc:creator>idea0rbit</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45543609</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45543609</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Why is observability so broken?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://omji.ai">https://omji.ai</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45543608">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45543608</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2025 20:47:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://omji.ai</link><dc:creator>idea0rbit</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45543608</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45543608</guid></item></channel></rss>