<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ign0ramus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ign0ramus</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:47:17 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ign0ramus" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "PSA: Intel Graphics Drivers Now Collect Telemetry by Default"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What's the name of the fork?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Aug 2023 15:01:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37035425</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37035425</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37035425</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Racket: Lisp for the modern day"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're probably not. Programming in lisp,back in my college days, felt enlightening. I remember flying through quiet complex projects with a clarity that I've rarely experienced in my professional career. I do yearn for those days when I'm deep within a nonsensical "enterprise" Java codebase or a messy frontend codebase but I don't think Lisp made me an objectively "better" programmer. There is enough imposter syndrome in this industry as it is. If you ever want to, pick up SICP or "How to design programs", you'll probably find them interesting but don't expect to find programming nirvana.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2023 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36523615</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36523615</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36523615</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Ask HN: Why would Google sell Google domains to Squarespace?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No they don't. What are you talking about?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2023 11:24:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36354741</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36354741</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36354741</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Apple Vision Pro: Apple’s first spatial computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for replying! I hadn't heard of half of the items on this list which I think kind of proves GP's point.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 22:16:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36204784</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36204784</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36204784</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Apple Vision Pro: Apple’s first spatial computer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I realize that they have had many failures in their long history but it seems like they have been on a roll since the iPod release 22 years ago. Do you know of any product flop from Apple in the last two decades? I'm genuinely curious.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 05 Jun 2023 21:22:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36203848</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36203848</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36203848</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Reliability: It’s not great"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Here's a post explaining how they do it <a href="https://fly.io/blog/docker-without-docker/">https://fly.io/blog/docker-without-docker/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2023 20:03:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35046808</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35046808</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35046808</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "The bottom is dropping out of Netflix"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I found that as a result, dialog was clearer. I really hate how loud everything other than dialog is in most movies for the sake of 'immersion'. I eventually gave up and settled on using subtitles when I don't want to miss any parts of a conversation.<p>FWIW, I'm way more fluent in English than French.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 23 Apr 2022 10:56:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31133142</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31133142</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31133142</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Tailscale’s human-scale networks are still controlled by Google and Microsoft"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're definitely not having a stroke. Here is another thread discussing the same thing. I specifically remember the 'polycule' comments. It was my first time learning about that word.<p>[1] <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30937892" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30937892</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2022 01:47:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30939735</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30939735</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30939735</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Starbucks and TrustArc add fake cookie processing delay if you don't click agree"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It does support plugins but only on Android.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2021 13:08:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28511008</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28511008</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28511008</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Jay Leiderman has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Come on. Is this kind of baseless speculation really warranted?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2021 03:11:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28477382</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28477382</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28477382</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "GraalVM at Facebook"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wouldn't say they are ignoring it. Case in the point that guide, you linked, recommends targeting recommends using C++17 which I think qualifies as modern. Compiler support for some of the newer features of C++2x hasn't matured yet.[0] That recommendation to avoid them seems sensible.<p>[0] <a href="https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support#cpp20" rel="nofollow">https://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/compiler_support#cpp20</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2021 20:54:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27788379</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27788379</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27788379</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Lethal Autonomous Weapons Exist; They Must Be Banned"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A tomahawk with a 1000 lbs warhead weighs 2900 lbs (or 3500 lbs with a booster)[1]. It's a long range missile so, it is probably possible to achieve a better ratio for something shorter range but I have doubts regarding quadcopters like the ones discussed in the article being able to do so by virtue of how fixed wing craft (which the tomahawk is IMHO).<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_(missile)" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tomahawk_(missile)</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2021 16:46:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27530595</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27530595</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27530595</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Making a Robot Chainsaw. Carving dogs.[video]]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix68oRfI5Gw">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix68oRfI5Gw</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26689990">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26689990</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2021 15:04:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ix68oRfI5Gw</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26689990</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26689990</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Telegram is booming but needs advertisers and $700M soon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for digging it up! It did help. As Slymon99 had pointed out, Facebook doesn't earn the same amount from each user. Something I hadn't taken into account.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2021 17:30:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26479980</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26479980</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26479980</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ign0ramus in "Telegram is booming but needs advertisers and $700M soon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That number seems wildly off. Facebook's annual revenue for 2020 was $85.97 Billion[1]. With 2.8 Billion monthly active users, they'd need to charge $3 a month to exceed that number.<p>[1]: <a href="https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/2021/Facebook-Reports-Fourth-Quarter-and-Full-Year-2020-Results/default.aspx" rel="nofollow">https://investor.fb.com/investor-news/press-release-details/...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2021 16:04:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26467651</link><dc:creator>ign0ramus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26467651</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26467651</guid></item></channel></rss>