<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: imenani</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=imenani</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 09:44:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=imenani" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by imenani in "A 0-click exploit chain for the Pixel 10"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/1065620/" rel="nofollow">https://lwn.net/Articles/1065620/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 14:42:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149300</link><dc:creator>imenani</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149300</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48149300</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by imenani in "New arXiv policy: 1-year ban for hallucinated references"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://xcancel.com/tdietterich/status/2055000956144935055" rel="nofollow">https://xcancel.com/tdietterich/status/2055000956144935055</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 20:59:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141172</link><dc:creator>imenani</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141172</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48141172</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by imenani in "Rewrite Bun in Rust has been merged"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The author discussed this here four days ago<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077663">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48077663</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 12:59:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48134774</link><dc:creator>imenani</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48134774</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48134774</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by imenani in "Significant raise of reports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>With the benefit of hindsight, perhaps much of this was Claude Mythos? The model was deployed internally since Feb</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 16:56:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706102</link><dc:creator>imenani</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706102</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47706102</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by imenani in "The risk of AI isn't making us lazy, but making "lazy" look productive"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. LLMs have helped me achieve much deeper reading, _when directed to do so_. Asking an LLM to “Teach me Socratically about this paper/code. One question at a time”, usually allows me to get a much deeper reading of the material than I would otherwise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2026 16:15:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555922</link><dc:creator>imenani</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555922</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47555922</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by imenani in "LLMs aren't world models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Each of these models has a thinking/reasoning variant and a default non-thinking variant. I would expect the reasoning variants (o3 or “GPT5 Thinking”, Gemini DeepThink,  Claude with Extended Thinking, etc) to do better at this. I think there is also some chance that in their reasoning traces they may display something you might see as closer to world modelling. In particular, you might find them explicitly tracking positions of pieces and checking validity.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 22:00:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44858678</link><dc:creator>imenani</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44858678</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44858678</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by imenani in "LLMs aren't world models"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As far as I can tell they don’t say which LLM they used which is kind of a shame as there is a huge range of capabilities even in newly released LLMs (e.g. reasoning vs not).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2025 20:17:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44857965</link><dc:creator>imenani</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44857965</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44857965</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by imenani in "Does RL Incentivize Reasoning in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They fix the temperature at T=0.6 for all k for all models, even though their own Figure 10 shows that RL model benefits from higher temperatures. I would buy the overall claim much more if they swept of temperature parameter for each k and model like they did in the Codex paper [1].<p>[1] <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.03374</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2025 19:24:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43775762</link><dc:creator>imenani</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43775762</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43775762</guid></item></channel></rss>