You got a whole data center doing god knows how much compute running billions of matrix multiplications all to solve a trivial css overflow bug in a text box. And this includes the LLM itself writing custom web-servers programs and python scripts when the best estimate guess from a google search probably would have given you the same result.

I liked the idea of using nvim but i rewrote it with bash function for easier argument handling

  nman () {
    if [ $# -ne 1 ]; then
      echo "Usage: nman "
      return 1
    fi
    command nvim "+hide Man $1"
  }

Economist what you think central bank does exactly that this is somehow too far?

1) I don't understand this argument. As if we don't absolutely do this all the time. Theft as a concept is impossible to completely prevent yet we still know it to be illegal. Same with Vandalism. The supreme court just made it legal to prosecute the homeless. Hell there are countries were suicide is illegal.

2) You say this as if a room temp superconductor is something that endless dollars aren't spent on trying to achieve.

> They shouldn't be set around "morality," they should be set around established civil liberties.

These are not whole distinct things. They are two overlapping circles. No one but the most unscrupulous of lawyers conceive of these a 2 wholly distinct entities.

Unethical or "uncivil" behavior is something that happens and to act like we have are hands are tied and shouldn't adapt to address this because our hands are tied because there are unintended consequences is asinine and impractical.

Yes I would like functional civil institutions that are able to protect me from the unethical behavior of others. Welcome to Civics 101 today we are reading John Locke.

(https://ipwatchdog.com/2024/07/10/preliminary-injunction-ftc...)

Wouldn’t this have made it impossible to prosecute Nixon for Watergate?

I expect a lot of court shopping to judges in Texas to get favorable result to abscond with any regulatory oversight