Hacker News: impulser_

New comment by impulser_ in "MiMo Code is now released and open-source"

impulser_ — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 23:38:09 +0000

You got to miss spell these days or people assume your ai :)

New comment by impulser_ in "MiMo Code is now released and open-source"

impulser_ — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:39:52 +0000

It's because they do things that is why they score differently. Coding hardness add features for user experience not for agent efficiency. If they did all the coding hardnesses would be using bash and code mode and letting the agents write code to perform tasks but this doesn't work because you want humans in the loop. You want users to be able to approve and deny writes. You want uses to see edits. So you have to build tool for these. It's hard to show diffs when the agent is just using bash.

New comment by impulser_ in "MiMo Code is now released and open-source"

impulser_ — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:11:21 +0000

Because there is literally nothing special about coding hardnesses. The models are doing all the lifting. It just user experience that separates them.

A coding hardness with just bash outperforms Codex, Claude Code, OpenCode, Pi ect. The added features are just user experience features.

New comment by impulser_ in "Anthropic walks back policy that could have 'sabotaged' researchers using Claude"

impulser_ — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 05:29:21 +0000

Yeah and their belief are fucking crazy and dangerous. They are literally sabotaging their users. They built in malware into their model if you prompt it about training a fucking AI model. It doesn't tell you, no it literally sabotages you by editing your prompt and intentionally goes against your request.

You want fucking nut jobs like this building models?

It's one thing to build safeguards on your model and have it prompt the user back. I'm sorry I can't help you with this request. Chinese models do this for some requests.

It's another thing to actively try to make the model perform worst for your user on purpose because it asked the model to do something you, the model creator, didn't like.

Imagine someone is asking a logical medical question and the model swaps the prompt and purpose being less intelligent and gives bad advice to this person.

How do these people not understand they are stupid.

New comment by impulser_ in "Anthropic walks back policy that could have 'sabotaged' researchers using Claude"

impulser_ — Thu, 11 Jun 2026 03:50:27 +0000

It's kinda weird to think the Chinese AI labs might be more trust worthy than the US labs.

- Anthropic is ran by a bunch of nut jobs.

- OpenAI is ran by a guy you can't trust.

I don't even know if we should include DeepMind, Meta, or xAi in the conversation of AI labs at this point since they can't produce models better than Chinese labs.

New comment by impulser_ in "Claude Fable 5"

impulser_ — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:22:55 +0000

Every model release is just proof that AGI will most likely only be for the rich. We are a few years into LLMs and majority of people are already getting priced out of intelligence from LLMs and these are no where near AGI.

New comment by impulser_ in "Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models"

impulser_ — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:47:21 +0000

Yeah, but the models are running in Google Cloud which makes sense they are based on Gemini.

New comment by impulser_ in "Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models"

impulser_ — Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:45:34 +0000

I think the last thing Google wants to do is get on the bad side of their largest partners.

New comment by impulser_ in "Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models"

impulser_ — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:49:41 +0000

This is probably why Google had to rent compute from SpaceX. They needed to free up NVIDIA GPUs for Apple so they probably moved internal workloads to SpaceX compute.

New comment by impulser_ in "Apple reveals new AI architecture built around Google Gemini models"

impulser_ — Mon, 08 Jun 2026 22:43:35 +0000

They are using Google Cloud.

https://security.apple.com/blog/expanding-pcc/?linkId=100000...

"Now, we are collaborating with Google and NVIDIA to run new Apple Intelligence workloads on Google Cloud, extending our industry-leading PCC privacy commitments to third-party data centers for the first time."

New comment by impulser_ in "Alphabet announces $80B equity capital raise to expand AI infra and compute"

impulser_ — Tue, 02 Jun 2026 01:29:34 +0000

This is equities + bonds which are pretty liquid assets.

New comment by impulser_ in "Alphabet announces $80B equity capital raise to expand AI infra and compute"

impulser_ — Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:26:54 +0000

I don't think you understand the size of the US capital market. We are talking probably ~150 trillion.

It's easy as fuck for Google to raise this money because they are a money printing business. They are the most profitable company in the world, so for anyone this is basically the same as buying US debt.

New comment by impulser_ in "Alphabet announces $80B equity capital raise to expand AI infra and compute"

impulser_ — Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:22:58 +0000

Yeah, but Google has the money for this. They are quite literally the most profitable company in the world. They are only raising because they don't want to harm there other businesses buy eating up their capital for this.

Why do you think there will only be one winner?

New comment by impulser_ in "I am against GenAI and everything it stands for"

impulser_ — Sun, 31 May 2026 18:32:53 +0000

"models that 99.9% of the world cares about aren't."

Software engineers aren't 99.9% of the world.

New comment by impulser_ in "I am against GenAI and everything it stands for"

impulser_ — Sun, 31 May 2026 00:22:54 +0000

"If all of this was done to better humanity, AI development would be done in public, data would be legally obtained, models would be released for free, access wouldn't be gatekept behind ever increasing subscription costs."

The vast majority of AI development is public. There are papers literally every single day to read. In fact everything you need to build Claude and GPT models is public. Thanks to Google, DeepSeek, and all the other research labs. There are more research labs than there are closed shops. In fact there really is only one Anthropic, and lately maybe OpenAI. Google still releases papers all the time on AI.

There are more open source models than closed source models and all of them are accessible without a subscription. Yeah you still need to pay for them, but hey as we build out infrastructure and more time is put into efficient models today will easily run on person compute of the future.

New comment by impulser_ in "Show HN: Zot – Yet another coding agent harness"

impulser_ — Sat, 30 May 2026 03:46:50 +0000

Harnesses aren't really going to change much of the performance on models like Opus, and GPT.

You literally can just give the model a bash tool and it will do just fine in fact it will most likely do better than majority of harnesses due to how well models are at bash.

The model do all the lifting. It really doesn't matter which harness you use.

New comment by impulser_ in "Claude Opus 4.8 may have distilled Qwen"

impulser_ — Fri, 29 May 2026 20:50:38 +0000

People need to stop thinking that LLMs actually know what they are. They don't. They don't know their Qwen, They don't know they are Opus. They don't even know they are an LLM.

This is why literally every single model's system prompt starts with something like:

"You're Claude Opus a large language model from Anthropic"

New comment by impulser_ in "Claude Opus 4.8"

impulser_ — Thu, 28 May 2026 17:03:37 +0000

No. GPT models follow instructions significantly better than Claude models.

You tell it too research a repo to find a piece of code it will. Claude will just read the README and guess.

New comment by impulser_ in "Claude Opus 4.8"

impulser_ — Thu, 28 May 2026 16:57:59 +0000

Crazy they bring up honest, when Claude models are literally known for straight up lying about things it has done and tries to act like it did what you asked.

New comment by impulser_ in "Use boring languages with LLMs"

impulser_ — Wed, 27 May 2026 03:29:35 +0000

I have tested almost every language and Go is pretty good but for some reason LLMs get paranoid over races and just start spamming locks next thing you know every fucking struct has mutexes and every function has locks lol.

The best language I have seen an LLM use was Kotlin. It actually surprised me how well it wrote the language. I wrote a project in it and I think I didn't have to correct it once. Like I was seriously impressed. I just wish Kotlin had better tooling so I didn't have to use gradle or maven lol.