In the 1990s when crypto went to court. It was determined that really anything coming from AI is protected speech. Very few exceptions, AI cant export a few things.

So you're never seeing AI go away, which means you need to transition/adapt.

Text is protected by first amendment.

Best of luck with your unconstitutional ban on speech.

This is not a wealth fund at all. This is a debt fund. It doesnt even try to hide the debt that's drowning the federal government.

We are borrowing money to play the stock market.

It's whether or not warrantless searches are admissible; and they generally arent.

Why? You're not going to attract any of the audience. You likely could have just chose a new name and built whatever you want to do with this.

Chretien: “We have no better friend than the United States.”

Martin: “Our relationship with the United States is our most important.”

Trudeau: “There is no closer friend, partner, and ally than the United States.”

The only thing to change was a new Prime Minister. Who has attacked the USA as fascist; a feeling Liberals in Canada very much agree with. He and his wife talk about a new world order. Why is he pushing anti-USA so hard?

Biden, republicans and the democrats pulled him in front of congress to answer questions about potential antitrust/collusion he was committing. JPmorgan and BOA pulled out alleging collusion. Vanguard and many others exitted shortly afterwards. This collusion system fell apart.

However, when Carney became liberal leader and prime minister. The investigations were paused and Trump endorsed Carney many times. While Carney is also unable to get a deal with the USA.

Carney was colluding in the name of climate change, but as PM he has temporarily gotten rid of the carbon tax, and lowered federal excise. Imagine being pro-climate change and also being the guy who is dismantling his own party's efforts. Or wait was it all fraudulent collusion?

In reality, Carney ran on the platform of getting a deal with Trump but seems to be intentionally sabotaging this process. Which will cost Canada millions of jobs.

It's better than 27b?

That said, I stopped using Openclaw for Hermes. Openclaw released a massive patch that broke openclaw to an unrepairable state. I tried Hermes and havent even considered going back.

Dont use openclaw, use hermes.

Go play CS if you care so much about balance.

Next level, you medic and heal the hoovies. Winning every round automatically by not fighting.

Huge deficit, shocking how quick it has increased in a year while also cutting government jobs.

Meanwhile they have fired/(attrition with new rules they will violate) nearly 100,000. About 25% of the government.

I dont blame the people doing the austerity, I blame those who forced the austerity.

>will be surpassed in enough aspects that there isn't anything where we can provide enough value to live off.

Regardless of that. AI is here to stay. Nobody is going to revoke the constitutions and criminalize AI to prevent this from happening.

What's going to happen will happen.

They do! It's a 1 year course about "Introduction to Python" and that's it.Wild.

>Teaching AI is a rather large field are you talking about LLMs/transformers? Are you talking about working with LLMs, which is something that seems to change every 6 months?

That's a valid point. But that means education is more important as opposed to dont teach it at all.

It is an interesting situation to be sure. Not my place to say what they say or do. I'm just commenting about the situation.

>Opposes AI in what way? No courses on it? Does not allow students to utilize it? I have a hard time believing they do not offer a single course on any AI subject.

Publicly opposed to the use of AI.

If a student is found using it, they are expelled. There's 1 public case where a student used Em-dashes and got accused of cheating. GPTzero says human written, but they got expelled. Probably just 1 extreme story, but i dont know.

As for courses. If you look up the 'courses' they do have a machine learning course where it has a single class. "Introduction to Python"

That's it. And that's a course, not even a degree or certification.

They have a 1 year 'data analytics' masters but it explicitly says it's not machine learning or AI. Here I am thinking university is rarely 2 years, always 3+. Yet this is just 1 year? Odd.

>Many colleges are offering it as a post-grad option, at least in Canada.

In fact, this was the more interesting case. I go to one of the networking events put on by the college, as a professional and not student. Nothing about AI technically, but the subject comes up often and almost always in negative light.

I looked into like being a teacher of AI at the college, but they have nothing at all.

>In general? I don't understand what you are getting at here.

Sorry. My bad. I have autism and dont communicate well.

Technically speaking, they are leftists who publicly oppose AI. They created the new Chief of AI Officer who has no support at all from the univeristy, had to go to politicians for support.

Whereas the college straight up opposes AI.

But what value is any of their degrees anymore? Suspicious at best.

Textile workers worried about machinery saying it's going to result in collapse of the economy when they lose their job.

But every time there's a new technology that threatens some jobs because of an increase in efficiency but investment thus can be placed in other locations creating new jobs. different kinds of jobs.

It's not different this time. Each time the luddite movement is wrong. They are solely concerned with their own selfish concerns and the demands to stop the technological improvement will not be heeded.

You believe politics exists to protect individual rights, maintain fair process, and prevent the concentration of power. You’re suspicious of anyone who claims emergency powers. The question you always ask first: is this legitimate?

The Real irony is that I'm Canadian. The Liberals are in power but are the most illiberal in our history.

They illegally crushed protests with emergency powers. They arrested political opponents who were simply travelling the country to campaign. They are actively silencing political opponents. They are actively seizing billions of $ of private property. They have bought and control the media who never dare criticize the government, while nothing but attack ads against political opponents. Extreme bias and political control over the media in Canada.

They have bills to seek to eliminate free speech, right to protest, freedom of religion, fair elections, and further prohibiting private property.

In fact, it should balance out, especially over centuries of global content. There's absolutely no chance that the training data itself is the bias. IT's the filtering and labelling of the content that introduces the bias.

The AI companies are taking left wing content and labelling them "high quality prestige" and then looking at right wing content and labelling it "opinion low quality" or whatever. That is where the bias is occurring.