The debt is on the balance sheet and even the VC investments are listed so you can figure out how much they have to make to be on the whole profitable (as opposed to operationally)

The "Starlink" is for clicks

You don't even have to read the document yourself.

Plenty of people are summarising it themselves and using AI.

The loss from Xai is over 7B

Clearly untrue. Given that's the source of the reported steep losses

Remove AI and it's a good business.

Most of what I see are Kubernetes offerings and VPS

We know how much was spent by Xai too.

You can wait for Godot if you wish.

Figure 1 on the graph should have shamed you enough into not posting.

The other part is the money you're talking about was almost all spent/awarded before this current government. There's your conflict of interest.

You aren't mistaken. You know you're spreading misinformation about this stuff

It may be confusing to others but it's ultimately your choice.

Turns out capping costs help. (See SLS) (See Europa Clipper)

Contracts aren't subsidies and you know that. It's straight up dishonesty to mix them up.

McDonald's and Burger King are government contractors

There's no Kessler Syndrome where Starlink is.

You'd know this if you read Kessler's first paper. It's online.

i.e if every single Starlink satellite crashes into another you won't get Kessler Syndrome.

And the same it true for the planned Kuiper.

5 million over 5 years capex+opex. Mostly opex

It's also a troll post

What's the point of the except?

The main problem is the AI stuff.