Meanwhile Copilot launched a full bot for it:

"Dos and don’ts of medical AI While AI is a useful tool that can help you understand medical information, it’s important to clarify what it’s designed to do (and what it isn’t).

Dos: Use AI as a reliable guide for finding doctors and understanding care options. Let AI act as an always available medical assistant that explains information clearly. Use AI as a transparent, unbiased source of clinically validated health content. Don’ts: Don’t use AI for medical diagnosis. If you’re concerned you may have a medical issue, you should seek the help of a medical professional. Don’t replace your doctor or primary care provider with an “AI doctor”. AI isn’t a doctor. You should always consult a professional before making any medical decisions. This clarity is what makes Copilot safe" https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-copilot/for-indivi...

Good move there, at least.

> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nickdc_copilot-pro-is-no-more...

> https://www.linkedin.com/posts/nickdc_copilot-pro-is-no-more...

¹ the science is sound, the safety is absolutely a guarantee. There is a group of about 10 individuals who have spent their entire life spreading their neurological issues and obsession with fake reports and exaggerations of the harmful made-up side effects that cannot be repeated in any study whatsoever anywhere..

I actually could not believe the other day that they are still active and have managed to cause the FDA to issue a guidance that there might be higher side effect rates than otherwise were reported .

It's actually ridiculous, and every news article and study about it are almost entirely mentioning people who's just start believing in their heads that they have side effects when they actually don't. And yet the news articles took this as evidence of a story that has been hidden or something .

I really thought that those 10 or so individuals who you used to be able to read their forum posts back in 2006 when they tried to tell every young guy in the world not to take it for hair loss would have fizzled out by now.

I skimmed down and if this was about Kagu indexing being out of date then sorry I just realized that