<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: insurgent_dino</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=insurgent_dino</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 06:36:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=insurgent_dino" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by insurgent_dino in "UK set to announce social media ban for under-16s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you agree that parents should be the one protecting their children from this 'propaganda' and internet slop?<p>Whilst I agree that social media can be overwhelmingly negative especially for young people, dont you recon that the risk to privacy and free-nature / increased surveillance of the internet is a greater problem?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:23:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529049</link><dc:creator>insurgent_dino</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529049</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48529049</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by insurgent_dino in "UK set to announce social media ban for under-16s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>100%, anti-privacy and surveillance laws have always been wrapped in child protection and public safety.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:07:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528817</link><dc:creator>insurgent_dino</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528817</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528817</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by insurgent_dino in "UK set to announce social media ban for under-16s"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This<p>The government shouldn't be parenting other parents kids</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 16:03:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528755</link><dc:creator>insurgent_dino</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Ask HN: Do you believe in the Permanent Underclass theory?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Recently I've been hearing about the Permanent Underclass,<p>In my words it is the idea that those who don't build wealth before AI is capable enough to replace them, will be put in a position to be forever poor unable to find work.<p>Heres how Guillermo Flor put it 'Today, it has become repopularized as a viral term for a theory that posits that people have a limited window of time to build wealth before A.I. and robotics are advanced enough to fully replace human labor.'<p>What are you all thinking,<p>Disclaimer, I remain neutral, I do not believe or disbelieve in this theory.</p>
<hr>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528500">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528500</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528500</link><dc:creator>insurgent_dino</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528500</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48528500</guid></item></channel></rss>