<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: intuitionist</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=intuitionist</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 20:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=intuitionist" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "The dead economy theory"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you have a reference here, or are you just going to continue to baldly state it as a fact? I’m looking at “Attention is All You Need” and don’t see any grant numbers or anything like that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2026 17:38:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326548</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326548</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48326548</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "GameStop makes $55.5B takeover offer for eBay"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Worth also pointing out though that if you can sell new shares above intrinsic value that is accretive to existing shareholders. Dilution isn’t always a bad word. (It’s bad for the people buying new shares.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2026 16:02:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010419</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010419</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48010419</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "GPT-5.5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>ChatGPT isn’t literally or figuratively cutting off anybody’s limbs though. It’s more like, the guy on the assembly line had a mech suit, and now he doesn’t have a mech suit, and he’s sad. Skill atrophy is a real concern but unless you assume that nobody is working to maintain those skills it doesn’t change my analysis much.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:42:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883173</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883173</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883173</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "GPT-5.5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I am not a Marxian economic expert but this doesn’t make sense to me. Modulo skill atrophy, the big AI model provider can’t capture that surplus value because its customers can just go back to bidding for human labor instead.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 22:33:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883062</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883062</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47883062</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "Sir Tony Hoare has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sadly it seems to be true. Heard it late last week from a coworker in a position to know.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2026 00:05:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47317531</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47317531</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47317531</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "The Brand Age"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>“There are three of these things made in a year, and I’ve got the juice to get one of them” is. Zuck doesn’t care about a million dollar price tag, any more than I would care about a couple bucks.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 23:36:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268755</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268755</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268755</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "The Brand Age"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Grand Seiko makes some truly beautiful watches, and also some terribly gaudy horrors.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 23:32:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268718</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268718</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268718</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "The Brand Age"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The price isn’t keeping anyone at that level of wealth from buying a Nautilus or a Lange 1 or a panda Daytona. But they can still flex with ultralimited pieces like Zuck’s Greubel Forsey.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 23:14:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268561</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268561</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47268561</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "Global Intelligence Crisis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The point is that the market doesn’t move enough on the jobs data to trigger a circuit breaker, not that there’s a -20% move and it doesn’t trigger.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 22 Feb 2026 22:42:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47115570</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47115570</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47115570</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "The Programmer Identity Crisis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A Russell conjugation: my LLM-based coding output, your Claude throwaway code, his complete AI slop.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Oct 2025 20:48:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45661502</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45661502</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45661502</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "LandChad, a site dedicated to turning internet peasants into Internet Landlords"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>you don’t know that, maybe the term “landlord” hurt their feelings</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2025 13:04:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45082851</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45082851</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45082851</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "Tom Lehrer has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I like to think Lehrer would have appreciated the irony of being predeceased by his obituary’s author.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Jul 2025 11:05:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44709577</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44709577</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44709577</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "Mary had schizophrenia, then suddenly didn't"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For my money Rachel Aviv is the best and most interesting writer currently on the New Yorker staff (give or take a David Grann, who is pretty much just writing books these days it seems). I go out of my way to read whatever has her byline.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 20:57:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44652902</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44652902</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44652902</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "QSBS Limits Raised"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>IANAL but I believe the option has to be exercised before the company reaches $50M in assets—that’s when you buy the stock.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 21:04:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44475529</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44475529</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44475529</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "Gov. Greg Abbott vetoes THC ban"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Now the question I ask is: how was it distilled? what chemicals were used in the process? are those chemicals safe? and a million other related questions. With regular pot there's none of that.<p>You absolutely should be asking those questions about “regular pot” as well. AIUI concentrates are among the bestselling and most profitable products in legal states, and they use uncertain chemicals of questionable provenance even if the delta-9 THC is 100% natty. But even if you’re just buying flower you could reasonably be concerned about pesticides or mold [1].<p>I think there are some quite good reasons to oppose cannabis legalization (for example, it’s made the super-high-potency concentrates which are associated with bad outcomes much more widely available) and it’s possible your own culture war or other biases are getting in your way here. But there are also lots of good arguments in favor of course.<p>[1] <a href="https://www.wsj.com/health/healthcare/marijuana-mold-contaminants-safety-a172c230" rel="nofollow">https://www.wsj.com/health/healthcare/marijuana-mold-contami...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 15:13:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44356633</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44356633</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44356633</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "The cultural decline of literary fiction"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This might prove too much, particularly for the case of literature. There were people writing commercially successful and culturally relevant literary fiction in 1970; back then you already had Austen and Tolstoy and Dostoevsky and Cervantes, plus Joyce and Woolf and Hemingway and Faulkner. I think there’s books published in the last 50 years that deserves a place on a short list of Best Novels, but I don’t think it has much overlap with the best-selling literary fiction being published at that time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2025 00:21:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44351377</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44351377</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44351377</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "Walkers' Sensations Poppadoms vs. HMRC: The Chip of Theseus"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> This is not necessarily a paper read by the rich and powerful, but just by those in the finance industry/politics/academia/c-suites/board-members.<p>I’m not sure who you think wealthy and powerful people are, if not those</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Jun 2025 17:49:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44152584</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44152584</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44152584</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Notes from the BugBash Conference]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://emptysqua.re/blog/notes-from-antithesis-bugbash/">https://emptysqua.re/blog/notes-from-antithesis-bugbash/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44131016">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44131016</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 22:32:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://emptysqua.re/blog/notes-from-antithesis-bugbash/</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44131016</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44131016</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "Walkers' Sensations Poppadoms vs. HMRC: The Chip of Theseus"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The FT is well worth reading (regardless of anyone’s personal beliefs, it’s useful to get a sense of how the wealthy and powerful think by reading their papers) but note that the FT Alphaville blog, which published this piece, is free to read if you create an account (you don’t need to pay).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 15:42:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44127169</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44127169</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44127169</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by intuitionist in "Remembering Alasdair MacIntyre"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I dunno. Utilitarianism sounds nice on the surface—how can you be against the greatest good for the greatest number?—but it’s pretty under-specified (hedonic or preference? act or rule? do you discount future beings’ utils, and at what rate?) and if you take any particular specification seriously you get moral claims that are <i>wildly</i> counterintuitive, like “insect suffering is orders of magnitude more important than heart disease in humans” or “there may be quadrillions of sentient beings in the far future, and making their lives 1% better is a better use of resources than eradicating malaria now” or “it’s morally justified to steal billions of dollars of other people’s money to give to pandemic prevention and AI safety.” And maybe these are correct claims, but they definitely don’t align with many people’s moral intuitions, and it’d be a tall task to convince those people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2025 17:32:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44074765</link><dc:creator>intuitionist</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44074765</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44074765</guid></item></channel></rss>