then, make it so your answer is more valid than if they asked what you usually have for breakfast.

i guarantee you more gov actions can be positively impacted by the breakfast question than the religion one.

the ONLY use for religious data is to get it for free for campaigns.

it's so tiring.

it IS an accounting certification. That include a cursory look at (likely outdated, often creator for the audit and never read by anyone) documentation.

I'm 100% certain they keep that for retraining. I've seen advertising pipelines promise the same thing and drown in data "because it's anonimized".

I'm certain same exact thing happens with Ai chatbots, even on top enterprise licenses.

"bind mounts? I'm better without it"

if you must use windows, it's because you will compile for windows. so you install MSYS, which is a linux distro-ish compiled native for windows. and do your work.

wsl2 (and this apple thing) is just a meme. if you're working in it, you're better of just installing Linux or ssh'ing to a server.

this is LLM, it's not like a science or something.

* except ram

the comment you replied to is word-by-word what people hyping canadian telecoms were saying before the dotcom crash!

why do you think every capital accumulation in the past caused "absentee landlords"? everyone wants the profit without even having to collect the rent.

Ai (or Bangladesh) doesn't have to do the work better than you, just deliver more X, where X is work output div capital input.

it just told me to f off. lol.

i bet this company got funded, imploded headcount, nobody see a profitable exit, and now they are all fighting each other for quarterly promotions based on whatever metric they can both improve and entice the cto. which i will go on a wild guess and say its page load performance.

remember how the bank giving your money to the wrong person was a crime? and then when "the computet" did it was just business as usual and you paid more for banking because now they had "computer fraud" insurance?

same thing. cop deliver false report, jail (hah! i know). now, it was "the Ai". so no jail, they will go back and put rules for the cop to read or something.

and we are making everything worse by the minute. One gov push back on Ai nonsense, ibm/rh cames up with all sort of lies that would make any engineer or research laugh on their faces (federated learning being for privacy, instead of cost cutting. or explainable Ai being real, and not something bolted after the inference with extra unexplainable inference. etc.) but that are good enough to fool the regulator.