https://github.com/usetrmnl/trmnl-koreader

(I built the koreader plugin)

https://github.com/usetrmnl/terminus

https://github.com/usetrmnl/trmnl-koreader

(I built the koreader plugin)

But feel deeply into it. It's heartbreaking yes, but love is underlying that heartbreak. The love of experiencing life.

Death is a doorway really. It grants freedom from the tyranny of the beliefs that things are permanent or they have to be a certain way. Every moment dies to the next and we are the constant awareness, aware of ourselves and the "things" we name that is actually just one thing - the totality of experience.

As experience continuously morphs, we remain at peace as that which hears these words. That which knows the thoughts that arise.

Death, in how we conceptualise it, is illusory. There is no evidence of anything apart from our awareness of it. Think of it like a move screen. To the characters in the movie, death is real. To the observer of the character it's a play. And what is a play with no stakes?

There are structural beliefs that we are this body. Are you this body? Does the body contain consciousness or is the body made up of consciousness (as in, without awareness of a body, how can it be known to exist). Same with our thoughts and feelings.

All concepts arise within this (whatever this is) but do not colour the colourless canvas that we are.

Yes, death is an experience but is it really the awareness, that which you are, that dies? Or is the thoughts of a body to which we attribute the thought of death?

I'm not talking about personal awareness. What would that mean? Awareness would be both aware of the term "personal" and "impersonal". Leaving the awareness still colourless as these thoughts come and go within it, inseparable from it.

So don't shy away from this, look closer and see it clearly. It's okay to have the beliefs we have about being the body but we cannot confuse it for our direct experience. And our direct experience of death, which is a thought.

Thus striking the perfect balance between effecting change when needed and acceptance of what is happening (reducing unnecessary psychological suffering).

This too is just one interpretation of free will which is truly a mechanism of no free will.

Go to the experience of validating that answer. That is your anchor and starting point.

You know that to be 100 percent true.

Then separate what you are aware of from you (that which is aware).

Then investigate the nature of the attribute you know you have for certain. Is it limited in anyway? Is it personal? Does all experience depend on it or does it depend on some element of experience?

Clarify the understanding of your experience of yourself. And only then ask this question again.

I would advise you go to your experience. Not thoughts and ideas. But directly to your experience and figure out what you want to.

To find happiness, first one must gain clarity about the one who is finding. If we can see that one we call "I" very clearly then the attainment of happiness is going to be easy.

If the question is unclear, the answer will be unclear or completely wrong.

bot: https://t.me/gratitude_buddy_bot

github: https://github.com/ikraamg/gratitude-buddy-bot

After failing to get myself to do gratitude journaling through other means, I got the idea of a simple chatbot. For me, the 'killer feature' that kept me using it was a daily reminder of a past entry that got me to smile on a pleasant memory.

I thought it might be helpful to more than my friends, family, and me. Feel free to use the same instance I use, or run it on your server.

I know this will not scale, so if many people find it useful, I will rewrite the bot in rails, add a web interface and migrate the data.

P.S. I had not dealt with databases at the time I built this, so please forgive the "DB" I used :)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30183091

Points: 1

# Comments: 0