<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: j1mr10rd4n</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=j1mr10rd4n</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 14:03:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=j1mr10rd4n" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "10 years ago, someone wrote a test for Servo that included an expiry in 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's another good reason that hasn't been detailed in the comments so far: expressing intent.<p>A test should communicate its reason for testing the subject, and when an input is generated or random, it clearly communicates that this test doesn't care about the specific _value_ of that input, it's focussed on something else.<p>This has other beneficial effects on test suites, especially as they change over the lifetime of their subjects:<p>* keeping test data isolated, avoiding coupling across tests
* avoiding magic strings
* and as mentioned in this thread, any "flakiness" is probably a signal of an edge-case that should be handled deterministically
and
* it's more fun [1]<p>[1] <a href="https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.01680" rel="nofollow">https://arxiv.org/pdf/2312.01680</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:25:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47843051</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47843051</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47843051</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "The Case That A.I. Is Thinking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You should definitely also read "Permutation City" by Greg Egan[1] if you haven't already! Amazing book...<p>[1]<a href="https://www.gregegan.net/PERMUTATION/Permutation.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.gregegan.net/PERMUTATION/Permutation.html</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 23:26:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805724</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805724</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805724</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "The Case That A.I. Is Thinking"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Geoffrey Hinton's recent lecture at the Royal Institute[1] is a fascinating watch. His assertion that human use of language being exactly analogous to neural networks with back-propagation really made me think about what LLMs might be able to do, and indeed, what happens in me when I "think". A common objection to LLM "intelligence" is that "they don't know anything". But in turn... what do biological intelligences "know"?<p>For example, I "know" how to do things like write constructs that make complex collections of programmable switches behave in certain ways, but what do I really "understand"?<p>I've been "taught" things about quantum mechanics, electrons, semiconductors, transistors, integrated circuits, instruction sets, symbolic logic, state machines, assembly, compilers, high-level-languages, code modules, editors and formatting.  I've "learned" more along the way by trial and error. But have I in effect ended up with anything other than an internalised store of concepts and interconnections? (c.f. features and weights).<p>Richard Sutton takes a different view in an interview with Dwarkesh Patel[2] and asserts that "learning" must include goals and reward functions but his argument seemed less concrete and possibly just a semantic re-labelling.<p>[1] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkdziSLYzHw" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IkdziSLYzHw</a>
[2] <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21EYKqUsPfg</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2025 23:11:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805599</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805599</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45805599</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "VIM Master"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> learning when I can be doing something more efficiently<p>hardtime.nvim[1] (or vim-hardtime[2] if you're old-school) do exactly this but within your editing session. There's an associated blog post[3] explaining the rationale behind some of the workflow choices and you can of course bring your own.<p>[1]: <a href="https://github.com/m4xshen/hardtime.nvim" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/m4xshen/hardtime.nvim</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://github.com/takac/vim-hardtime" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/takac/vim-hardtime</a><p>[3]: <a href="https://m4xshen.dev/posts/vim-command-workflow" rel="nofollow">https://m4xshen.dev/posts/vim-command-workflow</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 27 Aug 2025 22:30:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45046143</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45046143</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45046143</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "Schemesh: Fusion between Unix shell and Lisp REPL"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>LISPy REPLs are awesome.<p>Babashka is another amazing tool for interacting with a shell with clojure (or a very close dialect thereof).<p><a href="https://babashka.org" rel="nofollow">https://babashka.org</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Feb 2025 05:51:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43065690</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43065690</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43065690</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "The Geomagnetic Storm Continues"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>some amazing auroral displays seen from tasmania over the last couple of nights <a href="https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-24/strong-naked-eye-aurora-lights-up-tasmanian-skies/102258806" rel="nofollow">https://www.abc.net.au/news/2023-04-24/strong-naked-eye-auro...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2023 10:18:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35685673</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35685673</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35685673</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "Github Is Down"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>i'm getting intermittent 200/500s  - australia</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2020 08:54:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23572549</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23572549</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23572549</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "Deno Is a Browser for Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Rich Hickey's talk about this is enlightening
<a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLBGkS5ICk" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oyLBGkS5ICk</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:36:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23349205</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23349205</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23349205</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "Deno Is a Browser for Code"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was just racking my memory and searching through my library of interesting links to find exactly this!
Paul Chiusano gave a nice introductory talk at strangeloop last year: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCWtkvDQ2ZI" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gCWtkvDQ2ZI</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 12:34:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23349192</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23349192</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=23349192</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "Ask HN: Computer Science/History Books?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I thought Renegades of the Empire was a fascinating look into the internal machinations at Redmond and a bit of DirectX history too<p><a href="https://www.amazon.com/Renegades-Empire-Software-Revolution-Microsoft/dp/0609604163" rel="nofollow">https://www.amazon.com/Renegades-Empire-Software-Revolution-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2020 01:29:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22708439</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22708439</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22708439</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j1mr10rd4n in "Provably secure and high-rate quantum key distribution with time-bin qudits"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some recent posts have been talking about what happens to classical encryption in a post-quantum scenario. This article demonstrates a system capable of creating and distributing quantum keys at megabit-per-second rates.<p>phys.org link here <a href="https://phys.org/news/2017-11-high-speed-quantum-encryption-future-internet.html" rel="nofollow">https://phys.org/news/2017-11-high-speed-quantum-encryption-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2017 12:18:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15780579</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15780579</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15780579</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Provably secure and high-rate quantum key distribution with time-bin qudits]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/11/e1701491">http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/11/e1701491</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15780577">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15780577</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Nov 2017 12:18:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/3/11/e1701491</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15780577</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=15780577</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[British IT contractor tells of 946 days as Iraqi hostage]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/27/peter_moore_interview">http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/27/peter_moore_interview</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4840997">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4840997</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2012 04:15:28 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.theregister.co.uk/2012/11/27/peter_moore_interview</link><dc:creator>j1mr10rd4n</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4840997</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4840997</guid></item></channel></rss>