<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: j8k99kuyr</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=j8k99kuyr</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 10:16:10 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=j8k99kuyr" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j8k99kuyr in "Bybit loses $1.5B in hack but can cover loss, CEO confirms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Code is law, no?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:23:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43138362</link><dc:creator>j8k99kuyr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43138362</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43138362</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by j8k99kuyr in "Bybit loses $1.5B in hack but can cover loss, CEO confirms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> 2. Decentralized voting on reversal of transactions (90-95%+ vote needed to reverse to avoid 51% attacks)<p>Couldn't you technically just 'git checkout' a previous commit from before the fraudulent transaction occurred and pretend it never happened? Isn't the real problem that you'd have to convince a majority of users to do the same?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 22 Feb 2025 12:22:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43138355</link><dc:creator>j8k99kuyr</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43138355</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43138355</guid></item></channel></rss>