Warren Buffett is known to trade on product quality (he buys what he uses). So his sale could be based on that.

I agree it could have been worded better but I think it’s clear if you watch it in context.

The law requires Apple to provide equal access to the iPhone hardware and software in marketplaces that it competes in.

That can be done in a manner that is either additive, by providing access to third parties (which is potentially a significant expense and liability) or subtractive, by choosing not to engage in the regulated activities at all, in that jurisdiction.

I think that whether or not they built the thing does not matter.

Subverting democracy, to me, would involve things like dark money campaigns and lobbying.

Only needs a little bit of work to not drive into trains.

For inexperienced developers, you don’t need a framework to do something dumb.

Illegal dumping at the edges of the national forests is also a big problem that they can’t keep up with, as well as preventing other illegal activities like poaching or unlawful harvesting of resourceg.

Also, the government should be efficient but shouldn’t be required to break even or profit… it’s a public good.