<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jakevoytko</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jakevoytko</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2026 20:39:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jakevoytko" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Employers use your personal data to figure out the lowest salary you'll accept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>He recruited for wall street trading firms; based on the finance types I've met over the years in NYC I would 100% believe some did this just because they hated losing. He was just making the point that you should never lie about your salary history, because he can help you if you didn't want to give it but he couldn't help you if you BSed everyone and got caught.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 15:33:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662260</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662260</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47662260</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Employers use your personal data to figure out the lowest salary you'll accept"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An old neighbor of mine was a headhunter. He once told me that some companies had a trick to get around the law. Upon getting hired, you'd sign a document saying that you'd agree to all policies in the employee handbook. Pretty standard stuff. One of the company policies was that you needed to prove any previous salary you stated in the negotiation. If it was too far off, they'd just terminate you. The trick is that they didn't ask at all during the hiring process; you're already hired and onboarded and then HR puts a meeting on your calendar to explain the policy to you.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 13:50:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660924</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660924</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47660924</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Significant raise of reports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fun fact: I was on the Google Docs team from 2010-2015. Save didn't do anything but we still hooked up an impression to the keystroke to measure how often people tried to save. It was one of the top things people did in the app at first; it was comparable to how often people would bold and unbold text. And then as people gained confidence it went down over time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 20:06:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619496</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619496</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47619496</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Significant raise of reports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are some rose-colored glasses when people say this.<p>Programs didn’t auto save and regularly crashed. It was extremely common to hear someone talk about losing hours of work. Computers regularly blue screened at random. Device drivers weren’t isolated from the kernel so you could easily buy a dongle or something that single-handedly destabilized your system. Viruses regularly brought the white-collar economy to its knees. Computer games that were just starting to come online and be collaborative didn’t do any validation of what the client sent it (this is true sometimes now, but it was the rule back then).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2026 13:32:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614259</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614259</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47614259</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Ozempic Is About to Go Generic for Billions of People"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m on tirzepatide and it’s crazy how it can truly reform habits. I’ve been a night snacker my whole life. I don’t even think about food after dinner anymore. At a bar, I used to pound down the last quarter of a beer so I could go get another. Now I might forget to finish it and I probably won’t get another. Now I feel full while eating for the first time in my life. It’s going to be truly transformative at scale, even knowing it doesn’t work for everyone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 18:42:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47469950</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47469950</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47469950</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Discontinuation and reinitiation of dual-labeled GLP-1 receptor agonists"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My doctor, who is on the older side, told me that he went through his records when GLP-1s started being prescribed for weight loss. He wanted to calculate what percentage of his patients (a) he had advised to lose weight, (b) reduced their weight to healthy levels, (c) and kept it off.<p>From the starting population of overweight people, only 3% of people dropped down to, and stayed, a healthy weight.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2026 18:26:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47469805</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47469805</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47469805</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Every layer of review makes you 10x slower"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I also think we're going to see a resurgence of either pair programming, or the buddy system where both engineers take responsibility for the prompting and review and each commit has 2 authors. I actually wrote a post on this subject on my blog yesterday, so I'm happy to see other people saying it too. I've worked on 2-engineer projects recently and it's been way smoother than larger projects. It's just so obvious that asynchronous review cycles are way too slow nowadays, and we're DDoSing our project leaders who have to take responsibility for engineering outcomes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 13:38:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412502</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412502</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47412502</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Agents that run while I sleep"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'll try that out, thanks for the tip!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 17:07:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338240</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47338240</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Agents that run while I sleep"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve been playing around with these kinds of prompts. My experience is that the prompts need a lot of iteration to truly one-shot something that is halfway usable. If it’s under-spec’d it’ll just return after 15-20 minutes with something that’s not even half baked. If I give it an extremely detailed spec it’ll start dropping requirements and then finish around the 60-70 minute mark, but I needed 20 minutes to write the prompt and I need to hunt for the things it didn’t bother to do.<p>I’ve gotten some success iterating on the one-shot prompt until it’s less work to productionize the newest artifact than to start over, and it does have some learning benefits to iterate like this. I’m not sure if it’s any faster than just focusing on the problem directly though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 10:07:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47333693</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47333693</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47333693</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Claude Code is a great Dad side project environment]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.bitlog.com/2026/02/28/claude-code-is-a-great-dad-side-project-environment/">https://www.bitlog.com/2026/02/28/claude-code-is-a-great-dad-side-project-environment/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203985">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203985</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2026 05:25:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.bitlog.com/2026/02/28/claude-code-is-a-great-dad-side-project-environment/</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203985</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47203985</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "How far back in time can you understand English?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As someone who took German in high school, Dutch had my brain flailing for vocabulary to understand but nothing connected.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2026 19:38:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47103920</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47103920</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47103920</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Ask HN: When has a "dumb" solution beaten a sophisticated one for you?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When I was on Google Docs, I watched the Google Forms team build a sophisticated ML model that attempted to detect when people were using it for nefarious purposes.<p>It underperformed banning the word "password" from a Google Form.<p>So that's what they went with.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 06:55:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46665427</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46665427</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46665427</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Ask HN: Share your personal website"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My blog is bitlog.com, and my personal newsletter is clientserver.dev</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2026 21:48:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46624107</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46624107</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46624107</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Scott Adams has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I should have clarified for people who had the good fortune to not be exposed to these posts, but that was usually his lead-in to his ultra toxic writing. i.e. it was an engaging hook that led to more engaging trolling</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:13:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46605171</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46605171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46605171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Scott Adams has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill_climbing" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hill_climbing</a> <-- applying this for getting more and more engagement</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:30:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46604392</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46604392</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46604392</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Scott Adams has died"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I followed his blog back when he started this descent, and I have a theory that it was hill climbing.<p>He used to blog about pretty innocent stuff; his wife making fun of him for wearing pajama pants in public, behind the scenes on drawing comics, funny business interactions he'd had. But then he started getting taken out of context by various online-only publications, and he'd get a burst of traffic and a bunch of hate mail and then it'd go away. And then he'd get quoted out of context again. I'm not sure if it bothered him, but he started adding preambles to his post, like "hey suchandsuch publication, if you want to take this post out of context, jump to this part right here and skip the rest."<p>I stopped reading around this point. But later when he came out with his "trump is a persuasion god, just like me, and he is playing 4d chess and will be elected president" schtick, it seemed like the natural conclusion of hill climbing controversy. He couldn't be held accountable for the prediction. After all, he's just a comedian with a background in finance, not a politics guy. But it was a hot take on a hot topic that was trying to press buttons.<p>I'm sure he figured out before most people that being a newspaper cartoonist was a downward-trending gig, and that he'd never fully transition to online. But I'm sad that this was how he decided to make the jump to his next act.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 17:16:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46604113</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46604113</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46604113</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "The Jeff Dean Facts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Chuck Norris facts" was a text-only meme format from the mid '00s. Stuff like "Chuck Norris is the only man to ever defeat a brick wall in a game of tennis" or "When Chuck Norris does push-ups, he doesn't push himself up, he pushes the Earth down." The Jeff Dean Facts use the same format. It doesn't have anything to do with Chuck Norris himself.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 14:51:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46541692</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46541692</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46541692</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Grok 4 Fast now has 2M context window"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>With the current crop of LLMs/agents, I find that refactors still have to be done at a granular level. "I want to make X change. Give me the plan and do not implement it yet. Do the first thing. Do the second thing. Now update the first call site to use the new pattern. You did it wrong and I fixed it in an editor; update the second call site to match the final implementation in $file. Now do the next one. Do the next one. Continue. Continue.", etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 09 Nov 2025 05:14:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45863097</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45863097</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45863097</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Ask HN: Why are most status pages delayed?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because the systems are so complex and capable of emergent behavior that you need a human in the loop to truly interpret behavior and impact. Just because an alert is going off doesn't mean that the alert was written properly, or is measuring the correct thing, or the customer is interpreting its meaning correctly, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 15:02:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45811772</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45811772</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45811772</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jakevoytko in "Taking money off the table"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cash flow is another facet of paying off your mortgage early, and I think it’s underrated. Eliminating thousands of dollars from your monthly expenses dramatically increases your flexibility. Since most people have “cash / reserve fund” and “retirement investments (do not touch)” as their major financial categories, it optimizes the one you interact with the most. You don’t need to always make the maximum possible to keep a comfortable amount of cash on hand, which gives you more flexibility to take time off between jobs, or tank a layoff, or take that startup job that pays less (but damn if it doesn’t look fun). Personally I recently bought a second apartment adjacent to my first in order to combine them into a 3br. Paying off the first mortgage years ago was the difference between being able to afford the monthly expenses and not.<p>Obviously you need to consider both net worth and cash flow when making a decision like that, but don’t underrate the difference that improved cash flow makes!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:54:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45770597</link><dc:creator>jakevoytko</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45770597</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45770597</guid></item></channel></rss>