<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jamiepinheiro</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jamiepinheiro</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2026 22:58:18 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jamiepinheiro" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jamiepinheiro in "The microstructure of wealth transfer in prediction markets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was thinking of a similar idea to this, but for news/tweets/posts. As a consumer of media, I might decide to only read media with $x staked, so AI media factories need to be willing to stake that much to reach audiences, and will get penalized when they are wrong…<p>I imagine a hard problem is building a system to resolve these markets.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 14:23:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46810577</link><dc:creator>jamiepinheiro</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46810577</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46810577</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Bot or Not – a social deduction game with LLMs]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://bot-or-not.jamiepinheiro.com">https://bot-or-not.jamiepinheiro.com</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43454692">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43454692</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2025 18:16:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://bot-or-not.jamiepinheiro.com</link><dc:creator>jamiepinheiro</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43454692</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43454692</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Searching for Cyclic TV Reference Paradoxes]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://old.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/v5ej98/searching_for_cyclic_tv_reference_paradoxes/">https://old.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/v5ej98/searching_for_cyclic_tv_reference_paradoxes/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31636020">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31636020</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2022 00:05:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://old.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/v5ej98/searching_for_cyclic_tv_reference_paradoxes/</link><dc:creator>jamiepinheiro</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31636020</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31636020</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jamiepinheiro in "Searching for Cyclic TV Reference Paradoxes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><i>TLDR</i><p>Recently, I fell down the rabbit hole of Cyclic TV Reference Paradoxes. These occur when a chain of fictional TV show references form a cycle. Each show’s reality depends on another being fictional, so a cycle of these dependencies would be a paradox.<p>I wanted to know if these paradoxes actually occurred and figured it would be an interesting programming exercise to try and find out. It was effectively a graph problem, where each node was a TV show, the directed edges were references between them, and any cycles were instances of this paradox. To build this graph I scraped, indexed, and searched over 40,000 subtitles across ~300 popular TV shows, finding 2000+ fictional TV references.<p>I built a small web app to visualize the data and perform depth-first searches to find these cycles amongst the references. 72 paradoxes were found!<p>Here’s a set of screencaps illustrating a paradox across 4 shows: <a href="https://imgur.com/a/4Ej6lr2" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/4Ej6lr2</a><p>Here’s a gif of the tool in action: <a href="https://imgur.com/a/1a9WqtC" rel="nofollow">https://imgur.com/a/1a9WqtC</a><p>You can try it out for yourself - <a href="https://jamiepinheiro.com/cyclic_tv_reference_paradox_finder" rel="nofollow">https://jamiepinheiro.com/cyclic_tv_reference_paradox_finder</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2022 14:39:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31631385</link><dc:creator>jamiepinheiro</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31631385</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31631385</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Searching for Cyclic TV Reference Paradoxes]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://medium.com/@jamiepinheiro/searching-for-cyclic-tv-reference-paradoxes-d125ff014279">https://medium.com/@jamiepinheiro/searching-for-cyclic-tv-reference-paradoxes-d125ff014279</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31631371">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31631371</a></p>
<p>Points: 4</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jun 2022 14:38:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://medium.com/@jamiepinheiro/searching-for-cyclic-tv-reference-paradoxes-d125ff014279</link><dc:creator>jamiepinheiro</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31631371</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=31631371</guid></item></channel></rss>