<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jandrewrogers</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jandrewrogers</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 13:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jandrewrogers" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[From AGI to ASI]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12683">https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12683</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48503527">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48503527</a></p>
<p>Points: 7</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 12:54:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://arxiv.org/abs/2606.12683</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48503527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48503527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Fully autonomous drones have killed human soldiers for the first time"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It depends on the system. Some modern systems can react to high-value targets of opportunity, hunt for targets, or switch to a new target if the one they are after is destroyed before they get there. There are different variants of the weapons to deal with different use cases. The 1990s versions were relatively limited though.<p>Target selection is much more networked, automated, and adaptive than it used to be. Missiles can talk to each other.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 18:16:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494303</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494303</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48494303</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "CEOs who think AI replaces their employees are just bad CEOs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve worked with CEOs in multiple large companies. I wouldn’t wish that job on my worst enemy. Nonetheless, someone needs to do that job and the intersection of difficulty and masochism is beyond what most people can do or endure. Many people try and fail. Their job, at the end of the day, is to eat an endless stream of shit sandwiches with a smile and a plan.<p>Much of the “competency” of a CEO in practice is to be able to accept the relentless drama and abuse without turning into an emotional wreck. Yeah, they have to make decisions, but that isn’t the part that makes the job difficult. That role takes an insane toll on the human spirit, and very few can do it for any length of time.<p>The cush job is often being CEO adjacent. You get most of the perks but also avoid most of the emotional abuse and drama.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 02:42:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48470704</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48470704</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48470704</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Apple decided not to roll out Siri in EU after denied request for exemption"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The technical problem is nothing like exchanging data with fitness trackers.<p>One of the issues here is that there are many people with strong opinions that don't understand the thing they have strong opinions about. Which is the normal state of human affairs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:04:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463900</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463900</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463900</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Apple decided not to roll out Siri in EU after denied request for exemption"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I understand Apple's position on this one. This is essentially a backdoor into all of your data. It is also a very useful feature. The EU regulators are disallowing guardrails without which this backdoor will be used to strip-mine people's personal data. The privacy implications are not legible to most people.<p>If I was more cynical I would suggest that this is being used as an end-run around encryption, since the encryption doesn't have backdoors for the government but this gives you access to all the same data.<p>When this backdoor is inevitably exploited in some very public fashion, it won't be the EU regulators that required the backdoor to exist who will be blamed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 16:44:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463536</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463536</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48463536</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why are so many young people getting cancer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That link suggests nothing of the sort. That aside, I’ve been tracking background radiation for years with my own sensors (for other reasons). I can’t replicate this claim there either, as expected.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 03:27:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455980</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455980</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48455980</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why are so many young people getting cancer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I wouldn't exactly call TV dinners "healthy". In many ways it was much more heavily processed fatty carbs than what passes for microwave food today. It was loaded with salt and sugar.<p>The main difference is that TV dinners were designed to be heated in an oven rather than a microwave, back when microwaves were less common.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:23:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48449192</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48449192</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48449192</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why are so many young people getting cancer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a vibes-based argument, there is no science behind it.<p>Many traditional foods from around the world have relied on nasty, toxic chemical processes since before chemistry was a real science. If anything, modern understanding of chemistry has made the removal of nasty chemicals much more complete and precise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:17:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48449071</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48449071</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48449071</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why are so many young people getting cancer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There is no increase in background radiation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 18:04:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48448853</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48448853</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48448853</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why isn't the U.S. better at soccer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The tallest soccer players are right around 6’6”. Outside of positions like center back and striker (and keeper), they rarely exceed 6’0”.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 01:26:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440377</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440377</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440377</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why isn't the U.S. better at soccer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Excellent point. I hadn’t even considered the number of games. Good players will play over 2500 minutes in a season. That is a completely different type of wear and tear.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 01:11:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440307</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440307</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440307</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why isn't the U.S. better at soccer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The amount of distance covered in a soccer game is twice that of a cornerback in an NFL game. Unlike NFL, soccer also has very limited substitutions so you can't readily swap in fresh legs. An athlete needs to be able to go the full distance at a high level.<p>A natural cornerback isn't going to be "quicker and faster" over that many miles without a different kind of conditioning that probably favors different genetics. That said, I do think the game would translate well for some cornerbacks in some roles.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2026 00:23:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440040</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440040</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48440040</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why isn't the U.S. better at soccer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The counterpoint to this is that, broadly speaking, Mexico is demonstrably no better at soccer than the US when it matters. A common talking point in recent years is that the US league is actually better at developing Mexican talent than the Mexican league, though that somewhat reflects different incentives.<p>I think a core issue is that US and Mexican teams rarely have an opportunity to compete against teams significantly better than themselves. Furthermore, structural constraints within both leagues limit the amount of talent separation that can occur between teams, so it looks a bit like being stuck in a local minima in terms of talent development.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:37:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48439306</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48439306</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48439306</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Why isn't the U.S. better at soccer?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yet Mexico is no better at soccer than America, broadly speaking. There is also a general feeling that in the US is better at developing talent than Mexico at this point. Some of Mexico's best national team prospects in recent years were developed by MLS academies.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 22:24:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48439187</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48439187</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48439187</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "Scientists ejected from diabetes conference for distributing journal reprints"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Americans don't talk about "general strikes" because they don't care about general strikes and never really have. That concept doesn't have a place in American culture. I know socialists keep trying to make it salient but that is like trying to impose democracy on Afghanistan.<p>You have to work with what you have, not what you wish you had.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 13:31:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48434662</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48434662</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48434662</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "India's surprise baby bust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are a surprising number of edge cases out there.<p>Quite a few assets can never clear a market — they have value in some abstract sense but no concrete sense. For example, assets that are legal to own and transfer but illegal to buy or sell.<p>Some commodity assets have value that it is nonetheless not always transferrable. A common example relevant to wealth taxes is intangible assets where value is bound in who owns it and not the asset per se. Most of the value vanishes the instant you transfer to e.g. the government.<p>Another common issue is that wealth taxes can directly conflict with existing load-bearing contracts. As a practical matter, these government can’t just void most contracts, including contracts the government is a party to, for the purposes of generating tax revenue.<p>All of which is why most real-world wealth taxes limit scope to a handful of liquid, legible securities and similar. But as a percentage of wealth, these are pretty small so you don’t collect much revenue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 05:08:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421589</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421589</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421589</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "India's surprise baby bust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In the long run this trend will depopulate all the cities, so we'll get there one way or another.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 03:28:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421098</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421098</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421098</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "India's surprise baby bust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The bigger issue is, at least in the US, roughly 2/3 of assets of the wealthy have no meaningful liquidity. There is also no mark-to-market because in many cases these are idiosyncratic goods that may only find a buyer once over decades. Even some real estate markets only clear a single transaction on the scale of decades so any valuation is mostly fiction -- there are no comparables.<p>You could pay for these using the 30% of the assets that have some practical degree of liquidity but now you are putting massive downward pricing pressure on those because it is essentially a leveraged liquidation. Effectively, the total percentage of assets that are non-liquid would increase.<p>People tend to underestimate just how non-liquid the assets of the wealthy are. Most of that wealth isn't in stocks and bonds.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 03:21:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421069</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421069</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48421069</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "India's surprise baby bust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The 1970s had a whole different level of poverty than we have in 2026. As in, the normal poverty of the 1970s largely doesn't even exist today in the US. The poor today would have been middle class back then, ignoring differences in technology. The standard of living is not comparable.<p>A single minimum wage was definitely a poverty wage in the 1970s even at the 1970s standard of living. I have no idea where you would get the idea you could raise a family on that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 03:03:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48420984</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48420984</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48420984</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jandrewrogers in "India's surprise baby bust"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Vienna massively depopulated in the mid-20th century, so it had a large excess of underused real estate. Vienna is only now starting to come back to its former population. It is like making the observation that housing is cheap in Detroit.<p>We need to make cheap housing work in places that have not experienced large-scale depopulation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 02:52:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48420946</link><dc:creator>jandrewrogers</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48420946</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48420946</guid></item></channel></rss>