New comment by jarkkom in "Nokia’s Burning Platform Memo (2011)"

jarkkom — Sat, 03 Sep 2022 13:57:11 +0000

N9 was not "proper" MeeGo, internally it was still mostly Maemo Harmattan, followup to N900, though they had few canceled hardware projects between N9 and N900. MeeGo was suppposed to be co-developed with Intel, but it was never going to go anywhere, because neither Nokia or Intel had no idea what they were doing. Nokia wasn't built to be a software company and Intel has given up on x86 in phones.

Only reason why N9 ever was released is because they simply brutally cut down the scope of the project, e.g. dropping Qualcomm-based variant for US/CDMA markets (that one was repurposed to be their first Windows Phone).

New comment by jarkkom in "Ask HN: Was the Y2K crisis real?"

jarkkom — Thu, 12 Mar 2020 16:15:24 +0000

It was very much real, lots of effort was spent to make sure everything worked correctly, especially around older billing systems which used only 2-digit years in fixed width records.

Because of all the preparation and upgrades being done, I think only incident we had when Y2k migration manager sent out "all clear"-email after rollover - Unix mail client he used formatted date on email as "01/01/19100" - though I suspect he knew of the issue and didn't upgrade on purpose just to make a point.

Hacker News: jarkkom

New comment by jarkkom in "Nokia’s Burning Platform Memo (2011)"

New comment by jarkkom in "Ask HN: Was the Y2K crisis real?"