There is nothing unethical about this. You can technically do this with a browser and its dev tools.

You being here is far more unethical than this app.

This is not true. They currently fund people and policies that are 100% anti-2A without any pushback. It's just a matter of fooling the people into accepting the anti-2A stuff you do support.

> I cannot remember basic boilerplate stuff.

I don't know exactly what you mean by boilerplate stuff, but honestly, that's stuff we should have automated away prior to AI. We should not be writing boilerplate.

I'd highly encourage you to take the time to automate this stuff away. Not even with AI, but with scripts you can run to automate boilerplate generation. (Assuming you can't move it to a library/framework).

Yes.

> If they got few impressions what does it matter?

Because, it was costing a lot of money or resources to stay on X. Kind of an odd follow up to your previous question.

> You can write the content once.

Pretty sure they know how to write content considering we are reading it.

You can't just ignore complete sentences because it hurts your narrative.

"They explicitly say they're staying on other platforms whose ideologies they agree with."

Why would you say that? That's a lie?

Oh wait... it sucks when people just remove important parts of what you say. Don't lie. It's not good.

> The Numbers Aren't Working Out

I don't know. That's front and center. Can to share how that's an "outright rejection"?

One way to think about it might be that the site supports lots of users who use it for various things. So, everyone uses 80% of the site, but everyone also uses a different portion of the final 20%. So, if you have lots of users, you might also have lots of smaller features that a significant minority use.

I don't know, just an interesting way of thinking about it.

> you’ll no longer be able to use your Claude subscription limits for third-party harnesses including OpenClaw.

My understanding is that Conductor and others aren't using it.

How is what you are asking for different from what they are saying?

You can use your Claude Code subscription with third-party tools, but you have to use the Claude Code harness. Or, you use the API. OpenClaw could use the Claude Code harness, but they don't.

If you are half wrong with your first examples, maybe you should focus on yourself first?

I get the point you are trying to make, but you can't do that spreading misinformation. Jesus.

Partner A is not random JS. The assumption there is 1) you have some official signed agreement with them and 2) you've done your due diligence to ensure you can use them in this way.

It's not just some person's GH repo who can freely change that file to whatever they want.

Hotlinking is as old as the internet, and a well-worn security threat.

It's being down voted because it's attacking a strawman. No one is saying they are the same exact thing. It's that you will see people activatley defending this as a big nothingburger when in truth, it's still a security breach that has the potential to lower our defenses.

That's not what the "but, her emails..." reference implies. It's not saying they are the same thing. It's saying that the amount of attention and excitement made about her emails was a show. And you know it was a show, a mockery, because with cases like this where something equally bad happens and nothing will come from it. Same thing with the signalgate from last year, or all the previous times the Trump administration used private emails or private communication for government business as well.

So, no. The fact that it is not the same is immaterial. Which makes the rest of your comment immaterial.

https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=392880

> Meanwhile, Kim sought ChatGPT’s counsel on how to proceed if Krafton failed to reach a deal with Unknown Worlds on the earnout. The AI chatbot prepared a “Response Strategy to a ‘No-Deal’ Scenario,” which Kim shared with Yoon. The strategy included a “pressure and leverage package” and an “implementation roadmap by scenario.”