> codex-5.2 is really amazing but using it from my personal and not work account over the weekend taught me some user empathy lol it’s a bit slow

[0] https://nitter.net/tszzl/status/2016338961040548123

Just because you can't afford to 10x all your customers' inference doesn't mean you can't afford to 10x your inhouse inference.

And 2.5x is from Anthropic's latest offering. But it costs you 6x normal API pricing.

Having higher inference speed would be an advantage, especially if you're trying to eat all the software and services.

Anthropic offering 2.5x makes me assume they have 5x or 10x themselves.

In the predicted nightmare future where everything happens via agents negotiating with agents, the side with the most compute, and the fastest compute, is going to steamroll everyone.

It's starting off as a MacOS app because that's the machine I have. I didn't know Swift or SwiftUI when I started. I now know them somewhat, but the entire app has been vibe-coded. This has made it slow going. Very "1 step forward 2 steps back" until I switched from Claude Code to Codex and GPT-5.

I'm hoping to start an initial beta within the family in the next week or two, and then a wider round in January.

That's why I can accept copyright even thought it's not perfect.

Would revenue / person-hour show a different trend? Because there are a lot of part-time and contract workers out there.

Guanfacine is also an alternative, and it's method of action also makes it anxiety reducing.

How do you take 5-10ug? Dissolve 10mg in a litre of something. Get a 1ml dosing syringe. It has 0.1ml markings.

You could start there and increase it until you find what works. Also, if you take very little you can have a break on weekends and not suffer too much while remaining sensitive to lower dosages.

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the publisher, except as permitted by U.S. copyright law.

“Reproduced” and “electronic” are the relevant terms here.

I remember when gpt-3 came out and you could get it to spit out chunks of Harry Potter and I wondered why no-one was being sued.

The models are built on copyright infringement. Authors and publishers of any kind should be able to opt out of being included in training data and ideally opt-in should be the default.

And I hope one day someone trains a model without the use of works of fiction and we find a qualitative difference in their performance. Does a coding model really need to encode the customs, mores and concerns of Victorian era fictional characters to write a python function?

"Advanced glycation end products (AGEs) form when proteins and fats (lipids) in the body react with sugar (glucose) and become glycated and oxidized."

So, maybe it's not so much the Maillard reaction but that sweetened brioche bun used in your fancy hamburger.

The end game is a brain-sized network where each neuron is an agent sending a 1M token prompt to a 10T parameter model to update their "weights".

The stimulation induced brain waves in the animals that occurred at the same, slow frequency.

Tests showed that the waves increased the flow of clean cerebrospinal fluid into the brain and the flow of dirty fluid out of the brain. They also showed that the fluid was carrying amyloid, the substance that builds up in the brains of Alzheimer's patients."

Does this mean we might be able to use something like TMS instead of sleeping?

And could a failure or reduced functioning in this system explain those people "allergic" to electromagnetic radiation?

And it is this very problem which led me to ask my question about different architectures.