Fable 5 might not be accessible for sub in the future despite their "best effort".

And 5.6-sol is as expensive as 5.5, so highly probable to be kept in sub.

So what's the plan? Hoping people stay on ClaudeCode because Sonnet 5 while Codex offers 5.6-sol to subsription peasants?

Seems risky

Did anyone tried a non-naive approach, aka throwing the image with a simple "rebuild it" prompt ?

Reality is Fable is x2 price increase against previous.

GPT5.5 is x2 price increase against previous. And after the last week reset, codex is hungry for your sub allowance.

Everybody can see that the massive raises are not matching the revenue, at all.

It's a surprising headline. Yes it does make sense to cut the price to gain market share, but it also make sense to keep it at a sustainable level, which seems to not have been reached yet.

It feels like you have parallel conversation with an agent, except it understands all the surface. And it's granular, surgical and precise.

Usage: I'm writing a game design document of 70 pages with it, working surgically without having to worry about what page number the edit was.

It really solved my main bottleneck which is telling the AI what to do in a complete and comprehensive context.

Readme is trash but your agent will understand what to do

https://github.com/WiseDragonAI/TheBlueprintTool

Anthropic is becoming "profitable" while burning a series H of 69 bns usd. Does it count as profitable?

I'm curious if someone well versed in finance can answer, because from my uneducated perspective, it's not profitable to burn billions in order to make a billion.

https://www.cnbc.com/2026/05/20/anthropic-revenue-explosive-...

Cartesian coordinates doesn't work well for the player so I wanted a lat/long/altitude grid system.

I could have spent few days walking through stackoverflow and debuging my upcoming flawed implementation.

ChatGPT web version almost one shot the helpers in 2024 and boy, there were a lot of pitfalls.

They want the plebs, they want the mass.

They did produce great value, claude code and opus 4.5 are a singularity in software engineering.

The job we practiced for decades simply doesn't exist anymore.

Nor publicly or in my internal reasoning. I rarely conclude without proof or very intense and clear intuition.

From a strategic PoV it makes sense to check if their model is dangerous, I wouldn't want to have my brand name associated with "NK hacker team find zero day in all linux servers of the web and ..."

Marketing move doesn't mean scam. It describe the ability to sell people over a narrative and surpassing your competitor in market share. And that's exactly what is happening.

My post is a "tribute" to the efficiency of Anthropic's communication. I never complained about anything, nor calling it a scam, nor saying they should have released mythos to the public instead of rolling it out to a selected cohort.

You tried to expand my words to make me say something I didn't, because my post wasn't giving you a clear conclusion of my opinion regarding their private release.

It means than even if the value you offer is similar as your competitors, you are the one conquering the market.

That's the only way to not becoming a commodity.