<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jcase</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jcase</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2026 12:12:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jcase" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "EMudhra Intermediate CA Compromise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’ve asked this question before and the answer was that not all HSMs support it and they're too expensive to replace.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2026 23:28:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50174108</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50174108</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50174108</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Let’s Encrypt is a new Certificate Authority: It’s free, automated, and open"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks. You're right. Now I'm just wondering what IdenTrust gains from free DV certificates.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 23:47:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9535777</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9535777</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9535777</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Let’s Encrypt is a new Certificate Authority: It’s free, automated, and open"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Acceptance into Mozillaʼs CA Certificate Program is usually discussed in public. Let's encrypt is not on the list of pending CA applications[0]. Does anyone know if they are introducing a new root certificate or teaming up with an existing CA?<p>[0] <a href="https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:PendingCAs" rel="nofollow">https://wiki.mozilla.org/CA:PendingCAs</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2015 23:37:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9535740</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9535740</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9535740</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Stupid certificate tricks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Running the openssl s_client command from the article will show you live.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2015 01:30:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9518390</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9518390</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9518390</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Researching a new form of HTTP caching optimization"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When you mentioned discourse serving 19k req/sec, does it hit the ruby stack at all? If no, serving 19k req/sec of cached HTML doesn't seem that impressive. What am I missing?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 10 Jan 2015 20:12:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8867763</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8867763</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8867763</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the Entire Web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're (almost) describing certificate pinning. Have a look at  <a href="http://tack.io" rel="nofollow">http://tack.io</a> although it appears down for the moment. Here is the HN thread: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4010711" rel="nofollow">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4010711</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:20:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629581</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629581</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629581</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the Entire Web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>With SSH you usually own both endpoints (or at least trusting your cloud provider).<p>The example you give with regards to exchanging a piece of paper is very similar. It's ridiculously hard to do such a thing on large scale without trusting intermediaries.<p>I'm putting my eggs on certificate pinning.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:11:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629555</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629555</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629555</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Launching in 2015: A Certificate Authority to Encrypt the Entire Web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This article[0] is largely about DNSSEC and DANE but it might give you some insights why making registrars the sole authorities isn't such a good idea.<p>[0] <a href="http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/ssl-and-the-future-of-authenticity/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/ssl-and-the-future-of-authe...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2014 12:02:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629530</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629530</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8629530</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[NewsgroupDirect Security Breach]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="http://www.newsgroupdirect.com/blog/2014/07/09/important-newsgroupdirect-security-breach/">http://www.newsgroupdirect.com/blog/2014/07/09/important-newsgroupdirect-security-breach/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8012635">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8012635</a></p>
<p>Points: 1</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2014 22:47:27 +0000</pubDate><link>http://www.newsgroupdirect.com/blog/2014/07/09/important-newsgroupdirect-security-breach/</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8012635</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8012635</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Why is FreeBSD deprecating GCC in favor of Clang/LLVM?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, whatever the license, here is to a bright future! That a rising tide may lift all boats.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Aug 2013 01:30:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6209476</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6209476</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6209476</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Why is FreeBSD deprecating GCC in favor of Clang/LLVM?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure this is true (anymore?). There are many open source projects who are thriving under non copyleft licenses.<p>If someone wanted to be a dick about it they could release modified GPL code as one big diff and publish it on some obscure webpage only their customers have access to. Instead we see more and more companies and individuals becoming friendly open source citizens. Perhaps some because the GPL mandates it but I would like to think mainly because they feel it's right thing to do—copyleft or not.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:35:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6209020</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6209020</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6209020</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Why is FreeBSD deprecating GCC in favor of Clang/LLVM?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not sure if you mean for profit <i>and</i> proprietary or just making money in general. For some reason though a lot of people think you can't sell GPL'd software which you absolutely can.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Aug 2013 23:25:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6208987</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6208987</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6208987</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Decentralized SSL cert verification"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>DANE isn't without its own problems. Moxie Marlinspike wrote an excellent blog post about it.<p><a href="http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/ssl-and-the-future-of-authenticity/#dane_dnssec_and_ssl_authenticity" rel="nofollow">http://www.thoughtcrime.org/blog/ssl-and-the-future-of-authe...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2013 23:54:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6042799</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6042799</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6042799</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Decentralized SSL cert verification"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If users can't configure their Facebook privacy settings I'm not too optimistic about their ability to manage root certificate trust bits. It's a good start though.<p>Ideally OS/Browser vendors would drop compromised CAs. That happened with DigiNotar. It's not always an option though — the three largest CAs have a 83.97%[0] market share. Dropping any one of them breaks the internet.<p>Unfortunately a lot of people seem hell bent on destroying rather than improving on top of it.<p>[0] <a href="https://ssl.netcraft.com/ssl-sample-report/CMatch/certs" rel="nofollow">https://ssl.netcraft.com/ssl-sample-report/CMatch/certs</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2013 23:41:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6042754</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6042754</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6042754</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Decentralized SSL cert verification"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sounds very similar to Convergence. In fact, it turns out that "Convergence is based on previous work from the Perspectives Project at Carnegie Mellon University".[0] I don't think this (or Convergence) will see widespread adoption though. For now, public key pinning (e.g. Tack.io) seems like the best way forward.<p>For what it's worth, many CA's are trying to raise the bar by way of the CA/Browser Forum.[1] The public mailing list is quite interesting at times.<p>[0] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergence_(SSL)#Background" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Convergence_(SSL)#Background</a><p>[1] <a href="https://www.cabforum.org" rel="nofollow">https://www.cabforum.org</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:37:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6041131</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6041131</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=6041131</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Ask HN: Google Chrome heuristic warnings pose threat to our business"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same version, no warning. Edit: Oops, had yet to read that it's now temporarily whitelisted by google.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Jul 2013 20:55:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5973489</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5973489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5973489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Show HN: Like Airbnb but for food"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting, thanks!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 18:18:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5752752</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5752752</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5752752</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Show HN: Like Airbnb but for food"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When the EU region was announced[1] last month they weren't Safe Harbor compliant (yet). Has that changed?<p>[1] <a href="https://blog.heroku.com/archives/2013/4/24/europe-region" rel="nofollow">https://blog.heroku.com/archives/2013/4/24/europe-region</a> (near the bottom).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:09:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5752243</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5752243</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5752243</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "Bad as Shit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For some reason it reminded me of "The Electronic Money Mill". Original site is gone but The Internet Archive has a copy: <a href="http://web.archive.org/web/20080412233535/http://www.msen.com/fievel/mmill/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://web.archive.org/web/20080412233535/http://www.msen.co...</a><p>Fun (semi-fictional) read about Electronic Funds Transfer, crypto and the FBI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 13 May 2013 15:27:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5699180</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5699180</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5699180</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jcase in "AWS Launches CloudHSM, Hardware Security Module For Managing Cryptographic Keys"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Luna SA they are using doesn't come cheap. For an H/A setup with all the extras (backup tools, service contract) I was quoted ~$80k.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Apr 2013 01:02:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5619729</link><dc:creator>jcase</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5619729</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=5619729</guid></item></channel></rss>