If they didn't claim depreciation in prior years they can still get it via Form 3115. Yes this is complicated/annoying to do (almost certainly need a CPA), which you can argue is unfair, but I'm still going to have limited sympathy for anyone DIYing in this space without talking to a professional.

Now? We have AGENTS.md files that look like a parent talking to a child with all the bold all-caps, double emphasis, just praying that's enough to be sure they run the commands you want them to be running

(1 Outside of some core ML developers at the big model companies)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46448195

Points: 3

# Comments: 1

As someone who has come from a JVM/go background, I was kinda shocked how amateur hour it felt tbh.

I now know 50+ people who live within ~2 blocks from me, who've gone from "random strangers" to "friendly neighbors" that I run into semi-randomly.

Pretty surprised they are still that low given prices elsewhere.

The implicit presence garbage screwed up the API for many languages, not just C++

What is wild is how obviously silly it was at the time, too - no hindsight was needed.

They pay 70% of revenue to rights holders. For an artist signed to a major label like Lily Allen, they'll get ~20% of that number after they've cleared their advance.

I'll +1 and say I highly recommend going through Crafting Interpreters, particularly as a way of building non-trivial programs in languages you are less familiar with - If you just follow the java/C example you are tempted to lean into copy/pasting the samples, but figuring things out in other languages is a great experience.

I spent a longass time tracking down an issue with how the reference interpreter implementation defines tokens: https://github.com/munificent/craftinginterpreters/issues/11... which was frustrating but good debugging practice.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40243182

Points: 1

# Comments: 1