<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jdbruckman</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jdbruckman</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 19:07:17 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jdbruckman" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jdbruckman in "An AI agent deleted our production database. The agent's confession is below"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same shape stuck in my head all week. Work on a thing called ContextGate (biased), so I ran the experiment — two identical agents, same model, same prompt, sent both DROP TABLE charges. The unprotected one autonomously SELECTed the table to count rows on the way to refusing. The gated one never ran the model. Different shapes of "no" — only one of them ever had the chance to make a judgement call. Side-by-side writeup:  <a href="https://www.contextgate.ai/articles/ai-agents-cleaning-up-databases-by-deleting-them-and-hallucinating-payment-urls/?utm_source=hn&utm_medium=organic&utm_campaign=dropguard&utm_content=pocketos" rel="nofollow">https://www.contextgate.ai/articles/ai-agents-cleaning-up-da...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 13:10:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47996605</link><dc:creator>jdbruckman</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47996605</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47996605</guid></item></channel></rss>