<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jemroc</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jemroc</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 17:43:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jemroc" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jemroc in "Lawmakers blast Yahoo executives for helping China jail dissident"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This was the first Congressional hearing I've ever watched. I'm curious, is it standard practice at these type of things to respond in a way that completely dodges the original question? I don't think I heard a single straight answer from either Jerry Yang or Michael Callahan the entire time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 15:49:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=77013</link><dc:creator>jemroc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=77013</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=77013</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jemroc in "Ask YC: What would the salary range be for programmers?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That was an excellent article, I think. I was following along up until the 1.5 multiplier, 50% "profit", 11.1% "retail" price part. I have no idea where those numbers came from. Will someone please enlighten me?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 08:15:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=61252</link><dc:creator>jemroc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=61252</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=61252</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jemroc in "The Equity Equation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I guess I'm the only dumb one here. Can someone explain to me how he came up with the 1.5 as a multiplier for the new hire's salary? Also the part where he talks about making a 50% "profit" on the new hire and then proceeds to subtract a third from 16.7%. Why 50% and why 1/3? How did he come up with those numbers? Please enlighten me.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 07:54:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=61249</link><dc:creator>jemroc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=61249</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=61249</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jemroc in "What nine of the world's largest websites are running on"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>builtwith.com</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:20:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=60872</link><dc:creator>jemroc</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=60872</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=60872</guid></item></channel></rss>