<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: jiveturkey</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=jiveturkey</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 06:09:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=jiveturkey" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Don't verify email addresses by sending spam to them"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>looks like a response to <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48445834">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48445834</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2026 21:59:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48652048</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48652048</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48652048</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "10Gb/s Ethernet: switching to a Broadcom SFP+ module"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> DACs are copper, and they're happy.<p>Well come on. GP really means <i>category cable</i> (twisted pair copper) is not happy at 10Gb distribution lengths (so-called horizontal cabling, although in a home it may span multiple floors without IDFs). That's kind of obvious context.<p>DACs are not category cable; they are twinax, short, and bulky.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2026 08:12:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567332</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567332</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48567332</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Stop Using JWTs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>JWTs can do that (delegate) and such capability is already well defined.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 22:59:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563453</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563453</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48563453</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Lies we tell ourselves about email addresses"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>entropy check, for one</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 01:37:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48470190</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48470190</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48470190</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Lies we tell ourselves about email addresses"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> TL;DR: Don't overthink it, just send a verification email.<p>pretty bad advice, if taken only as written, without adding more flavor on top.<p>the major email providers will penalize you if you generate too many undeliverable emails. thus, if you just send a verification email without any pre-validation, it's pretty easy to get into a DoS situation where current/valid users don't get important email sent to them, or that email is significantly delayed, plus incur huge operating cost to resolve the problem.<p>some form of rate limiting is needed, plus IMHO it's better to use a verifier service or your own heuristic or ML model to test for email validity including valid but fake/spammy/disposable addresses.<p>sorry, but we are way past the point of being able to have nice things, esp. when we're talking about email.<p>the "lies" part of the content is great. people do assume all those wrong things. however the TLDR is just wrong, and potentially harmful.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 00:47:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48469805</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48469805</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48469805</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "HP re-releases classic computer science calculator: The HP-16C"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>oooh. i have an original. it doesn't have the 'Collector's Edition' etching. Does that make it a fake?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 03:18:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379489</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379489</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48379489</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "EY Canada published a cybersecurity report and most citations were hallucinated"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But the chatbots/aggregators do, and they accept the reports as fact.<p>As is noted in the conclusion.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 22:45:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341333</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341333</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341333</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "EY Canada published a cybersecurity report and most citations were hallucinated"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Instead of releasing our results all at once, we're going to focus on one report at a time. This approach both prevents individual examples being overlooked and allows us to illustrate the negative impacts of vibe citing on research quality and public trust.<p>Not to take away from the actually great reporting here, but what they mean is, This approach allows them to milk it for as many clicks as possible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 22:43:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341322</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341322</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48341322</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Google Chrome adds session cookie theft protection for all users"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>why is that? you'd run yt-dlp from the same device you generated the cookies on (with a real browser). yt-dlp will have the bare cookie and also be able to refresh the cookie just like the browser.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 07:10:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333515</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333515</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48333515</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There was a secondary sale in April.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 20:22:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314914</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314914</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314914</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a newish term for this: RLO, Recurring Liquidity Opportunity. These are tender offers at some recurring interval. Even some companies that have a shorter lifespan (say 7 years) offer this.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 20:18:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314856</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314856</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314856</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Anthropic raises $65B in Series H funding at $965B post-money valuation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We are still in the short-half-life phase of GPUs. If a 2x faster GPU is on the horizon, why wouldn't OpenAI already be in line to buy? They aren't buying just 1, they are buying multiple datacenters' worth. So they wouldn't be a low priority, back of the line customer.<p>A short half-life means you are going to quickly dispose of what you have now, anyway. In fact most current datacenters can't even handle Vera Rubin, so I don't think there's short term risk here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 20:11:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314759</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48314759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "California moves to exempt Linux from its age-verification law after backlash"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><p><pre><code>  BOOBS
</code></pre>
<i>age verified</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2026 20:00:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270984</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270984</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48270984</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Residents, not just citizens.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 15:33:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209442</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209442</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48209442</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Anna's Archive hit with $19.5M default judgment and global domain takedown order"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Since when does a commission in the EU get to tell the entire World how to treat Personal Data?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2026 14:53:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208873</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208873</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48208873</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "The quiet renovation at Bitwarden"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah! Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 18:01:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183115</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183115</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48183115</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "The offline desk gadget that got me to sit up straight"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>well, you're complaining about an ad.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 05:32:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166285</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166285</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166285</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Ask HN: Why do hotels etc. WiFi networks all use captive portals?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Liability.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 17 May 2026 05:26:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166255</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166255</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48166255</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Show HN: Running the second public ODoH relay"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Going off on a tangent, I wish there were more awareness of how this concentrates power to Cloudflare.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 19:43:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140225</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140225</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48140225</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by jiveturkey in "Show HN: Running the second public ODoH relay"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Leaked to different parties.<p>Assuming you don't have ECH, you leak the question (in practical terms) to your ISP, <i>and</i> you leak your question to the DNS provider. With ODoH you plug the latter leak. Plugging that first leak is then still a problem (solved separately) but it's orthogonal to the second.<p>Even with ECH, where you plug the TLS leak, you have many more holes to plug. IP address might not be shared or might be shared across too few properties, and then traffic profile after the initial connect (to retrieve all the sub-resources) can identify destinations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 18:54:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139603</link><dc:creator>jiveturkey</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139603</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48139603</guid></item></channel></rss>