That’s the view of the government?

The culprit is the AMA.

> In the 20th century, the AMA has frequently lobbied to restrict the supply of physicians, contributing to a doctor shortage in the United States.[10][11][12] The organization has also lobbied against allowing physician assistants and other health care providers to perform basic forms of health care. The organization has historically lobbied against various of government-run health insurance.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Medical_Association

30 seconds of serious thought would tell you that your observation is wrong.

Again, a news organization can just change their robots.txt to block google from indexing their site.

They don't do that because that would instantly kill all their search traffic... and most likely kill their business.

If CNN changed their robots.txt to stop being indexed by Google, Google would literally lose 0 users.

> I wasn't picking a side as much as earnestly asking how OP concluded that its the news sites wanting something free from Google versus the other way around.

It's been explained to you several times. Instead you're more interested in acting self-righteous (it's honestly pretty cringeworthy).

Lol am I still reading HN or is this Reddit?

You can see the Core Web Vitals. What modern day news organizations are doing is nowhere close to that.

Can you elaborate on this? I'm not sure I agree.

Modern day applications are doing far, far more than they were 10-15 years ago. Much more traffic, much more data, much more tracking (unfortunately), etc.

I don’t think he’s being malicious. I think he genuinely just doesnt see a $5-10m NW as rich.

PG's definition of rich is probably 100x what yours is.

Thanks for telling me what to think.

> But it is not designed for "depression-like symptoms". It is designed for acute depressive mood disorders and suicide ideation which cannot be treated by other means, similar to electroshock therapy or TMS.

That's literally not true. Spend a few mins reading a survey paper on it perhaps? https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28249076/

It's had amazing results for treating depression -> https://www.health.harvard.edu/blog/ketamine-for-treatment-r...

Clearly they saved us during the pandemic!

You can google it if you want. It's all public info.

Isaacson also wrote a book on Musk and there's a chapter about this pay package and how absurd it was.

Tesla was close to bankruptcy where it needed to massively ramp up Model 3 production (and prove that there was demand for electric cars) in order to succeed. Tesla was the most shorted stock on the market and almost every hedge fund manager thought it was going bust.

Musk takes a pay package where he gets no salary or compensation if Tesla stock doesn't increase. For every $50 billion dollar increment in Tesla's valuation (Tesla was worth $60 billion at the time), Musk would get 1% of Tesla's outstanding shares at the time.

Basically everyone calls the pay package ludicrous and laughs at how ridiculous the deal is (no one thinks Musk will make any money).

Tesla manages to scale up Model 3 production and prove there is demand for electric cars.

Tesla proceeds to 10x (something very few people expected) and Tesla shareholders are massively rewarded. Every tesla shareholder is thrilled.

Musk makes $56 billion dollars but Tesla's valuation increases by $550 billion.

A tesla shareholder with 10 shares sues and says Musk's pay package was too large.

An activist judge agrees and now the lawyers want to walk away with $6 billion dollars.

Yeah.... summarizes the state of the US pretty well.

Punish risk takers & boldness. Award the lawyers.

It’s hilarious how you can be condescending and wrong.

“Isolationism” is completely different from not wanting the US to get entangled in Europe’s BS.