There is no room for false positive here in the same way you can't randomly find a collision in a hash function if it's strong enough. Like the rate is so infinitesimal that it is effectively zero.

Now replace random number sequence with prompted string of words. And instead of using the PRNG on every word I use it every n words. If the generated text is sufficiently long I can tell by matching the expected deterministic pattern.

You can defeat it by changing the words yourself and triggering a false negative but there isn't really any room for a false positive if the text is long enough and the pattern matches perfectly. If the pattern doesn't match then I can compute a probability.

You have to work in design mode and stop it from pissing code. Describe the requirements as detailed as possible and refine them based on the responses. It's quite rewarding and helps structure the way you think about the problem.

You could also look at other repos in github to see what they do to do the same task.

If you make a video player based on ffmpeg you take input videos. The attacker can share a specially crafted video with the victim. Same kind of attack as sharing word documents.

It is currently marking my little town as under fire / burned down, but it's not and hasn't been so far. (north west front of the fire, next to the lake). It looks like their contouring algorithm is very greedy and any hot spot marked in the past few days has become part of their fire perimeter.

The massive fire clouds probably contribute to the difficulty of measuring ground temperature from satellite.

But also, for this conjecture to be wrong is quite surprising to me. Intuitively I would think any convex polygon to be topologically equivalent to a circle, and any convex n-gon should be deformable into its regular version, then back to the other one…

No it also encourages the local market and healthy competition. This way in the future we don't fall into the same enshittification trap.

It's very frustrating, they delegate the responsibility of having written wrong information or code away to the bot, as if there was nothing they could do.

We do see light from galaxies that are receding away from us faster than c. At first the photons going in our direction are moving away from us but as the universe expands over time at some point they find themselves in a region of space that is no longer receding faster than c, and they start approaching.

It's sad because people that are ok with AI art are still enjoying the human art just the same. Somehow their visceral hate of AI-art managed to ruin human art for themselves as well.

Are there real life example of this? Or does anyone that scams people richer than them qualifies maybe?